John Livingston wrote:
> Mark McIntyre wrote:
>> John Livingston wrote:
>>> Mark McIntyre wrote:
>>>> John Livingston wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> There are some rather alarming reports about the radio interference
>>>>> these things can produce.
>>>>
>>>> This seems largely to be FUD to be fair.
>
> Not supported by fact. See the research papers listed in the URLs below.
>
>>> FM radio between 88 and 108MHz ??
>>
>> Isn't short-wave.
>
> "Short Wave" is an archaic term with very vague definitions. How about
> "HF radio" or "VHF Radio". That is 3-30Mhz and 30-300MHz, respectively.
>
>>> (More immune to AM interference but still noticeable in my experience).
>>
>> Are you saying you have personal evidence of interference with FM
>> radio from a homeplug device?
>
> No - did I say that ?
> The point was that FM is potentially affected by AM interference of all
> kinds. Including Homeplug.
>
> Homeplugs use "PLT" (Power Line Transmission). I'm not going to jump
> through hoops to convince you. If you have a problem with my views, you
> should read this report on PLT from the European Broadcasting Union
> Technical Review. It's at :
>
> http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_307-stott.pdf
>
> This paragraph from the report sums things up rather well :
>
> "Quite simply, it appears that radio reception and PLT operation cannot
> try to use the same frequency in the same place at the same time. Mains
> wiring is ubiquitous throughout the home.
> PLT normally operates as an “always-on” resource. So if PLT uses the
> same spectrum as radio services that are received in or near the home
> (broadcasting, amateur radio…) then interference and conflict is
> inevitable".
>
> If you want a more rigorous analysis - try this BBC research paper :
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp...les/WHP004.pdf
>
> If you still think Homeplugs are a good idea after reading and
> understanding that....
>
Well yes,they may be. Fascinating read, but not wholly relevant.
Remember that PLT was the proposed power line transmission IIRC whereby
internet traffic would be carried over miles of pylons etc. That was
effectively discounted partly for the reasons cited there. DSL itself is
the other technology under discussion, and for sure, all our DSL signals
fill the MW area with mush..
Homeplugs in order to get the data rate are probably operating up to
10Mhz or so.
That is, shortwave. We don't use shortwave for much of anyhing these
days apart from ham bands.
> Bear in mind, of course, that Homeplugs are themselves prone to
> interference from household electrical devices. As I said before - keep
> to standard data cabling and avoid this.
If you can., but just about every device these days has to pass
stringent tests with respect to injecting RFI into the mains.
Many people use homeplugs, and it works for them.
Caveats are in order, but a blanket dismissal is, I feel, not.