"Doyler" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:3f4e647a$0$224$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Does anyone know of a resonably priced 1024/512 home product - all the
ones
> I've seen are well over 100 quid a month: I can't work out why it is so
much
> more costly than twice the price of a 512/256 product (though I may be
about
> to find out!).
My gut feeling is that high upload lines are so expensive because you can
provide services off that line.
With 256 kbit/sec (and dynamic IP address) you hardly can provide useful Web
or FTP services.
High-upload sites are needed basically for providing web hosting or other
services.
You can and will raise money providing services.
Therefore, you are likely to be rich (that's what I think they think

)
Therefore you should be charged at a business rate. (read: share your
profits with us).
>
> Alternatively, is it possible to have two 512/256 lines going into a house
> and front them with a router (pc with routing services and a sprinkling of
> NICs or maybe something more sophisticated) to try and get the higher
> bandwidth out?
I've read about a successful experiment with a Firebrick router/firewall
that could accept two ADSL lines and use them as a bundle.
The person who wrote it claimed to have 2x (2048/256) lines = 4M down / 512K
up using that Firebrick.
Both lines were claimed to be from the same ISP.
Because someone else told that BT normally DSL-enables only one line per
household.
Though this may be just load of b*llocks.
--
_______________________
Maximillian!