Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > High Availabilty DHCP

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

High Availabilty DHCP

 
 
Luco
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-12-2008, 09:21 PM
My current environment has a single windows dhcp server with approx.
30 scopes. I was recently asked to come up a high availability DHCP
solution. I've been given a total of two servers, one for each data
center. This design should support my environment in the event my main
site goes down. All network routing is in place to support this.

Does anyone have any good solutions or recommendations I can go with?
I was thinking split scopes or a stand by DHCP server is all I could
really do with the amount of hardware given.


My network team wants to move this service to Linux but I want to keep
it on windows so my team doesn't loose visibility.


Your thoughts and opinions are appreciated,


Thanks in advance


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-13-2008, 03:36 PM
Your DHCP updates WINS and DNS for the sake of Active Directory,...so that
can't move it to Linux. Tell the Linux-Lovers to forget that.

You can't use a "spare" DHCP because if you bring it up in place of the
other the database won't match and you have a potential of Address
Conflicts.

The best way is to split the scopes across two DHCP Servers. The old school
was a 80/20 split. Never figured out why,...I mean if you lose the one with
the 80% you a really screwed. Most now use a 50/50 split.
Do not split the Range. Use the full Range on scopes on both servers,...make
the scopes identical. You use the Exclusions to create the "split"
If one goes down you can adjust the Exclusions on the remaining one so it
can handle all the addresses. When the dead one is repaired return the
Exclusions back the way they were. There may be some chance of an address
conflict but it is more minimal.

Also it is important to have fairly long lease period. The default is 8
days, that renews every 4 days. The longer lease buys you time to fix the
box without having to mess with the second one at all, so you don't have to
mess with the Exclusions back-and-forth and things are much simpler.

--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------


"Luco" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:EA862900-C03D-496E-A250-(E-Mail Removed)...
> My current environment has a single windows dhcp server with approx.
> 30 scopes. I was recently asked to come up a high availability DHCP
> solution. I've been given a total of two servers, one for each data
> center. This design should support my environment in the event my main
> site goes down. All network routing is in place to support this.
>
> Does anyone have any good solutions or recommendations I can go with?
> I was thinking split scopes or a stand by DHCP server is all I could
> really do with the amount of hardware given.
>
>
> My network team wants to move this service to Linux but I want to keep
> it on windows so my team doesn't loose visibility.
>
>
> Your thoughts and opinions are appreciated,
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is your favorite method to troubleshoot high-bandwidth/high latency networks? Spin Windows Networking 15 05-07-2009 08:04 PM
high ping latency correlation with high server activity Tal Bar-Or Windows Networking 0 04-29-2008 08:08 AM
TCP-High Availability Jarek Linux Networking 3 06-29-2007 02:36 PM
price still high amirbardagan@hotmail.com Broadband 0 03-16-2005 01:40 PM
wireless problem: high bandwidth but high latency Dan Christensen Linux Networking 1 01-19-2005 02:40 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11