Hey Muttley.

I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.

Graham

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:19:17 +0100, Eeyore
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.
>
>Graham

And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.

Muttley wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
>
> >I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.
> >
> >Graham
>
> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.

Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.

Graham

Eeyore wrote:
> Muttley wrote:
>
>> Eeyore wrote:
>>
>>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical
>>> max.
>>>
>>> Graham
>>
>> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
>
> Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.
>
> Graham

No point. You wouldn't believe him and say he was lying and faking the
figures anyway.

--
Carl Waring
DigiGuide:
Full: http://getdigiguide.com/?p=1&r=1495
Web-based: http://getdigiguide.com/?p=3&r=1495

Carl Waring wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> > Muttley wrote:
> >> Eeyore wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical
> >>> max.
> >>
> >> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
> >
> > Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.
>
> No point. You wouldn't believe him and say he was lying and faking the
> figures anyway.

I'd like to see even HOW he could prove it !

Graham

"Muttley" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:19:17 +0100, Eeyore
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.
>>
>>Graham
>
> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.

And I'm still working at my usual two-and-a-half megs, and don't really give
a monkey's!
;-)

George

Eeyore wrote:
>
> Carl Waring wrote:
>
>> Eeyore wrote:
>>> Muttley wrote:
>>>> Eeyore wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical
>>>>> max.
>>>> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
>>> Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.
>> No point. You wouldn't believe him and say he was lying and faking the
>> figures anyway.
>
> I'd like to see even HOW he could prove it !
>
> Graham
>
Oh, thats reasonably easy I think. Compare his NNTP posting address with
a download record off some server. Lots of them preserve who you are IP
wise.

George Weston wrote:
> "Muttley" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:19:17 +0100, Eeyore
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.
>>>
>>> Graham
>> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
>
> And I'm still working at my usual two-and-a-half megs, and don't really give
> a monkey's!
> ;-)

Well I've had 4032k raw for several weeks, BUT the SNR is fading fast
(1.5db reported) with the outside temperature..don't think it will hold!


>
> George
>
>

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:28:08 +0100, Eeyore
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>
>Carl Waring wrote:
>
>> Eeyore wrote:
>> > Muttley wrote:
>> >> Eeyore wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical
>> >>> max.
>> >>
>> >> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
>> >
>> > Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.
>>
>> No point. You wouldn't believe him and say he was lying and faking the
>> figures anyway.
>
>I'd like to see even HOW he could prove it !
>
>Graham

As Carl says...you'd only accuse me of lying and faking the
proof....like you did before.
I KNOW i d/load at 20 meg...whether you believe me or not is
irrelevant as it doesn't affect my speed one iota.

"Muttley" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:28:08 +0100, Eeyore
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Carl Waring wrote:
>>
>>> Eeyore wrote:
>>> > Muttley wrote:
>>> >> Eeyore wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical
>>> >>> max.
>>> >>
>>> >> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
>>> >
>>> > Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.
>>>
>>> No point. You wouldn't believe him and say he was lying and faking the
>>> figures anyway.
>>
>>I'd like to see even HOW he could prove it !
>>
>>Graham
>
> As Carl says...you'd only accuse me of lying and faking the
> proof....like you did before.
> I KNOW i d/load at 20 meg...whether you believe me or not is
> irrelevant as it doesn't affect my speed one iota.

Yawn - booorrriiing....