Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Hey Jeff, what u think the dBi is for this?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Hey Jeff, what u think the dBi is for this?

 
 
dakid
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-07-2010, 01:11 AM
http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/...t.php?CatID=33
&FamID=58&ProdID=374

They say 2-12? so they don't really know? or what?
Any idea what it is likely to be from indoors apartment
building? Price is kinda high.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
John Navas
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-07-2010, 01:24 AM
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 00:11:49 +0000 (UTC), in
<i3i8c4$7pa$(E-Mail Removed)>, dakid <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/...t.php?CatID=33
>&FamID=58&ProdID=374
>
>They say 2-12? so they don't really know? or what?
>Any idea what it is likely to be from indoors apartment
>building? Price is kinda high.


<http://goo.gl/EhEF>
 
Reply With Quote
 
John Navas
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-07-2010, 01:27 AM
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:24:46 -0700, in
<(E-Mail Removed)>, John Navas
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 00:11:49 +0000 (UTC), in
><i3i8c4$7pa$(E-Mail Removed)>, dakid <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/...t.php?CatID=33
>>&FamID=58&ProdID=374
>>
>>They say 2-12? so they don't really know? or what?
>>Any idea what it is likely to be from indoors apartment
>>building? Price is kinda high.

>
><http://goo.gl/EhEF>


They actually say:

The HA12W Window Antenna boosts the antenna power of standard
antennas from a minimal 2dBi to a more potent 12dBi.

In other words, 12 dBi, not a range.
Price looks not unreasonable to me.

--
John FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
 
Reply With Quote
 
George
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-07-2010, 02:52 PM
On 8/6/2010 8:11 PM, dakid wrote:
> http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/...t.php?CatID=33
> &FamID=58&ProdID=374
>
> They say 2-12? so they don't really know? or what?
> Any idea what it is likely to be from indoors apartment
> building? Price is kinda high.


Not Jeff, it is stated a little clumsily "The HA12W Window Antenna
boosts the antenna power of standard antennas from a minimal 2dBi to a
more potent 12dBi."

They are saying their antenna is 12dbi compared to a "standard antenna".

$50 is not an unusual price for an antenna.
 
Reply With Quote
 
dakid
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-07-2010, 07:44 PM
Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 00:11:49 +0000 (UTC), dakid

<(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/...ist.php?CatID=

33&FamID=58&P
>>rodID=374

>
> Or, just build your own:
> <http://pe2er.nl/wifisector/>
> <http://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/amos_antennas.htm>
>
> Typical photo:
> <http://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/Amos%20at%20work.jpg>
>
> Hmmm.... looking at the characteristics for the AMOS-3 (3

element
> Franklin) at:
> <http://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/amos_antennas.htm>
> it has only 10 or 11dBi max gain. Close, but not the rated

12dBi for
> the Hawking Tech antenna. In the inverted AMOS-3, the 85

degree
> horizontal is right, but with only 10 degrees of vertical

beamwidth,
> it's probably NOT the same as whatever is inside the

Hawking Tech
> antenna. Oh well... bad guess(tm).


Ok thanks for your calculations and replies and also to the
other repliers. I am using a 1' by 1' homemade parabolic
reflector behind a 5 inch whip-manila folder with pasted alum
foil glued to parabolic foam shapes made from a parabolic
template. What do you think the probabilities are that the
Hawkins will give a
significant improvement over that? The signal strength from
my adapter software says it is running about 80% but the
signal quality is only about 50-65%, and I am getting Rx
retrys about half of Rx Oks. Actually these readings seem to
bear little relation to the speed of downloading pages. Have
tried moving the antenna all around different positions and
different angles, am I am now getting the best I can get with
this antenna. The 1' by 1' reflector is affixed to slots on
the top of a small cardboard box aimed towards my window. I
tried lining the bottom of the box and sides outside the
reflector with alum foil, but did not improve things. I tried
shielding the adapter which is right below the antenna with
foil, also no improvement.
 
Reply With Quote
 
John Navas
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2010, 03:33 PM
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:44:01 +0000 (UTC), in
<i3k9hh$foj$(E-Mail Removed)>, dakid <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>... I am using a 1' by 1' homemade parabolic
>reflector behind a 5 inch whip-manila folder with pasted alum
>foil glued to parabolic foam shapes made from a parabolic
>template. What do you think the probabilities are that the
>Hawkins will give a
>significant improvement over that? The signal strength from
>my adapter software says it is running about 80% but the
>signal quality is only about 50-65%, and I am getting Rx
>retrys about half of Rx Oks. Actually these readings seem to
>bear little relation to the speed of downloading pages. Have
>tried moving the antenna all around different positions and
>different angles, am I am now getting the best I can get with
>this antenna. The 1' by 1' reflector is affixed to slots on
>the top of a small cardboard box aimed towards my window. I
>tried lining the bottom of the box and sides outside the
>reflector with alum foil, but did not improve things. I tried
>shielding the adapter which is right below the antenna with
>foil, also no improvement.


Have you tried different channels (1, 6, 11)?
Have you looked for sources of radio interference?
<http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi#Troubleshooting_Wi-Fi>

--
John FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
 
Reply With Quote
 
dakid
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-09-2010, 04:24 AM
Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:44:01 +0000 (UTC), dakid

<(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
> Hint: What problem are you trying to solve and what do you

have to
> work with? You'll get better answers if you supply this

information.

Thanks for your reply. Sorry I am not able to converse with
you at your level on this topic.

So far in my area I have found 3-5 APs, no encryption using
open routers, no pw. I am sure there are more. I just want to
surf the net and chat, primarily. Over months some disappear
and then new ones appear. I guess they are starting to wise
up that its not a good idea to run unencrypted APs with open
routers. Or maybe they are just leaving it open for whoever.

>
>>I am using a 1' by 1' homemade parabolic
>>reflector behind a 5 inch whip-manila folder with pasted

alum
>>foil glued to parabolic foam shapes made from a parabolic
>>template. What do you think the probabilities are that the
>>Hawkins will give a
>>significant improvement over that?

>
> 100%. Your antenna is probably not properly matched to 50

ohms. Your
> aluminum foil feed probably does not properly illuminate

the dish,
> resulting in "over-spray" with radically different gains on

receive
> and xmit. In short, without test equipment, a decent

design, and
> careful construction, your home made contrivance is

unlikely to
> provide a major improvement in antenna gain.


The parabola was cut from a template that supposedly is an
efficient half parabola with the rubber whip at the focal
point or as near as homemade can make it. So why the
"overspray", not sure what you mean by "illuminate the dish".
The antenna is designed to focus the reflections off the
parabola to the whip, and was intended for use with a whip.
Obviously I don't know half of what you're talking about,
sorry. Of course this is not factory made so I am sure that I
am not reaching the dimensions and curves as closely as with
factory built. As far as the 50ohm impedance, I guess can I
add a resistor to generate that, and where?

>
> That being said, I'm always amazed at how crudely an

antenna can be
> build and still work. That applies to antennas with gains

of less
> than about 8dBi, such as coffee cans and simple reflectors.

Over
> about 8dBi gain, things start to get critical and narrow

band.

>
>>The signal strength from
>>my adapter software says it is running about 80% but the
>>signal quality is only about 50-65%, and I am getting Rx
>>retrys about half of Rx Oks.

>
> Lots of retransmissions suggests interference. Try

different RF
> channels or run a site survey (scan of existing wireless

networks). If
> possible use a spectrum analyzer.


How can I change a channel for which I have no control over
the transmitter?


>
>>Actually these readings seem to
>>bear little relation to the speed of downloading pages.

>
> Got any numbers?


Only what I already gave you. The software supplied with the
usb radio does not help much in determining which antenna
position or even AP is providing the best throughput. For
examply I can get a signal quality of 40% and have better
throughput than when the bar reads 60%, or so it seems. Link
quality bar is not any help either.

>
>>Have
>>tried moving the antenna all around different positions and
>>different angles, am I am now getting the best I can get

with
>>this antenna. The 1' by 1' reflector is affixed to slots on
>>the top of a small cardboard box aimed towards my window. I
>>tried lining the bottom of the box and sides outside the
>>reflector with alum foil, but did not improve things. I

tried
>>shielding the adapter which is right below the antenna with
>>foil, also no improvement.

>
> I can't tell if the Hawking antenna is going to make any

improvement
> as you haven't disclosed how you're using the antenna and

radio. Are
> you trying to cover an area? Or are you trying to go point

to point?
> Big difference in recommended antenna types for each of

these. Also,
> indoors, outdoors, rooftop, folliage, through walls, etc.


>
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
> 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
>
>




No I want an antenna that I can move around, directional that
will find all the available open APs around me. Indoors,
cannot do outdoors. Have no idea whats between me and the
APs, I am relying strictly on signal strength bars, link
quality bar and how fast pages load and testing throughput
with online test sites. I think a true dish antenna will be
too difficult to aim, so something that is directional but
not too directional. Also, I have no idea how the Hawkins
works or what's inside it, I just know they are claiming
12dBi and thats probably much better than what I am getting
with my homemade job, IF their claims are not so much hot
air.

Sorry if I am not able to give you more than my ignorance in
this area (although I am learning) allows.

 
Reply With Quote
 
John Navas
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-09-2010, 03:04 PM
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 03:24:36 +0000 (UTC), in
<i3nsdi$nvm$(E-Mail Removed)>, dakid <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:(E-Mail Removed) :


>> Hint: What problem are you trying to solve and what do you have to
>> work with? You'll get better answers if you supply this information.

>
>Thanks for your reply. Sorry I am not able to converse with
>you at your level on this topic.
>
>So far in my area I have found 3-5 APs, no encryption using
>open routers, no pw. I am sure there are more. I just want to
>surf the net and chat, primarily. Over months some disappear
>and then new ones appear. I guess they are starting to wise
>up that its not a good idea to run unencrypted APs with open
>routers. Or maybe they are just leaving it open for whoever.


In other words, you are trying to steal broadband Internet service.

--
John

"We have met the enemy and he is us" -Pogo
 
Reply With Quote
 
dakid
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-09-2010, 08:29 PM
John Navas <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 03:24:36 +0000 (UTC), in
> <i3nsdi$nvm$(E-Mail Removed)>, dakid <(E-Mail Removed)>

wrote:
>
>>Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>>news:(E-Mail Removed) m:

>
>>> Hint: What problem are you trying to solve and what do

you have to
>>> work with? You'll get better answers if you supply this

information.
>>
>>Thanks for your reply. Sorry I am not able to converse with
>>you at your level on this topic.
>>
>>So far in my area I have found 3-5 APs, no encryption

using
>>open routers, no pw. I am sure there are more. I just want

to
>>surf the net and chat, primarily. Over months some

disappear
>>and then new ones appear. I guess they are starting to wise
>>up that its not a good idea to run unencrypted APs with

open
>>routers. Or maybe they are just leaving it open for

whoever.
>
> In other words, you are trying to steal broadband Internet

service.
>


If they leave their junk out on the curb in front of their
house, it's not stealing. Guess maybe you're one of the
people trying to steal money by charging outrageous rates for
what people can get for free?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11