thank you for your help Bill, but you are not helping at all

now talking server 2003 scenario, VPN connection are very likely to run with
browsing because i used this scenario for over 1 year. you just configure
routing and remote access service to act as a vpn remote access server. after
you connect you just open an explorer window and type \\servername and youll
see all the shares.
for your information, in IPv4 proprieties tab there's a check box "enable
broadcast name resolution", and here we are talking about a tunel, a virtual
private network witch has nothing to do with routers and wan links after the
connection was made.
the firewall will block a pachet no matter how encripted or clear text that
packet is. if i block port 500, no connection will be made on that port. what
you are talking about is statefull inspection and it refers to the content of
the load.
in my description i didnt mention a domain. the server is a standalone
server, and has no routing configured. just remote access server.
returning now to server 2008, i used the same steps and something is wrong.
to convince yourself, you can install and configure this scenario in 2003 to
see that is working and after in 2008 to see the diference.
thank you
"Bill Grant" wrote:
> Browsing is unlikely to work with a VPN connection. The browser service
> uses broadcasts, and these don't cross routers or WAN links. Even if WINS is
> running on the LAN and the remote client gets the correct WINS address,
> browsing usually fails. This is because the remote client usually isn't a
> domain member so doesn't know what name to use for the master browser.
>
> You should be able to use DNS for name resolution. Can you resolve a
> server on the LAN using the FQDN? If not, check that the remote client is
> receiving the correct DNS address at connection time.
>
> If you can resolve by FQDN, adding the correct domain suffix to the
> client's connection properties should let you resolve names using just the
> server name.
>
> The server firewall settings should have no effect on remote clients.
> When the packet goes through the firewall it is still encapsulated and
> encrypted. All the firewall sees is the PPTP or IPSec header.
>
> "Sergiu" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:B4228650-909C-46A6-A73D-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >i have the same problem and i also believe that must be some magic
> > i have ping on ip but i cant browse the network or ping netbios
> > the firewall is setup to allow file and print sharing but ..... vista
> > diagnose that port 445 is closed.
> > this vpn server was a 2003 one, i just upgraded to 2008. i also tryied on
> > a
> > clean install. same problem.
> >
> >
> > "(E-Mail Removed)" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi...what is the magic to getting a VPN client to have access to (map
> >> a drive) to a shared folder on Windows Server 2008? I can't seem to
> >> figure out what configuration settings I need on the server to
> >> accomplish this. I just want the VPN client to be able to map a drive
> >> to a shared folder once that client is authenticated and connected to
> >> the server via VPN. Thanks a bunch for your help!
> >>
>
>