In comp.os.linux.networking Timothy Miller <(E-Mail Removed)>:
> Ok, here's an example of one of the mounts from /proc/mounts (just
> found out about that):
> fish:/export/home/tim /home/tim nfs
> rw,v3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,hard,udp,lock,addr=s un 0 0
> Ok, so clearly, the default transfer size is WAY larger than any of us
> expected. I wonder how that default got in there.
Haven't seen this as default r/wsize on any distro whatever you
run? But a good value on a LAN, the default is about 8192 on many
systems. But those seem to change from time to time.
But might be one of the problems on your VPN, I'd lower this and
switch to "tcp" instead of "udp" at first.
> I've read that soft-mounting often causes havoc. If it actually DOES
> timeout, bad stuff happens. What is your experience and reasoning
> here?
My experience is exactly different, many problems with hard
mounting and zero with soft mounting.
> I'll fiddle with all of the other settings. Thanks.
Yep, the difference with tcp instead of udp would be most
interesting, if the server supports that.
--
Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94)
mail: echo
(E-Mail Removed) | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
#bofh excuse 325: Your processor does not develop enough heat.