"Martin Underwood" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>I'm bound to get asked at some stage to install a wireless network where the
>coverage from one access point (eg built into the router) isn't enough.
>
Hi, I've not used repeaters but have used mutliple APs to cover the
whole of Freetown, Sierra Leone. The longest distance was 17 km over
water!
One AP receives the signal then connects to another AP via a
hub/switch. You can add multiple APs if you want to point in
different directions, but the limit is 3 APs (you can sometimes get 4
if you are on a building and have antennas on the four corners. This
is because you are meant to have 3 channels between each broadcaster,
ie channels 1,5 and 9 (or 2,6,10) .
I think we had about 5 transmission sites, so it takes some doing to
make sure you don't interfere with each other. They now use 5.3GHz
between transmission sites to give extra coverage and reduce
interference.
My guess is that if you did use a repeater you would have to have a
seperate channel repeating or it would interfere with the original
transmission?
Not tried this on g, only the slower b.
>
|