decaturtxcowboy schreef:
> > Would there be any merit to fitting an antenna with a gimbal of sorts?
> Most likely no...the strain of the coax would be greater than gimbaled
> mass. Even if you attached an extension rod for greater mechanical
> leverage, it might not synch up with the swells.
I'm considering a wandy unit on my radar arch with an omni on top of
it...
The wandy is successfully used in marine environments on inshore
freightships.
Distances over 5 km's are reported with good connections.
http://www.wandy.nl/2voc.htm
The utp cable provides (also, next to the signal up and down) the 12v
and there is no long coax that eats a lot of dB's. Gimballing is a
thought but the specs mention a 60 degrees antenna beam width so I
doubt if gimballing will really make any difference. But I agree and
think it's worth a little test before I make the final choice regarding
gimballing it or not.
Like cowboy says gimballing it would be simpler with the "soft"
utp-cable than with the rigid coax.
Keeping the unit leveled at whatever swell could be achieved by adding
a low weight (if necessary).
I intend to make the buy in a few weeks, if the firm allows me to test
it before buying it...
I'll write anything worth reporting to this NG.
Regards, Len.