"Thomas Krüger" <(E-Mail Removed)> schreef in bericht
news:ch5chc$jrf$03$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> The intrudes will pass the MAC filter without any problem.
>
Agree
>
> WEP will not hide the MAC address. It's still transmited with every
packet.
>
Hmm, thats waht i didn't know......
>
> WAP will not hide the MAC address also.
> As you can see the MAC filter is one of the most insecure securety
feature.
>
> > A MAC address is very easy to clone.
>
> Yep, on Linux the intruder just has to do a "ifconfig interface hw ether
> new_mac_address".
>
Most standalone wireless interfaces can do that also:-(
> > If someone does this, will this block
> > an existing user?
>
> That hardly depends on the firmware of the access point and how it reacts
on
> double authentication. And how the client reacts on receiving it's own
> packets. In most cases the both system will keep working but there will be
> some errors.
>
Hmm, that's something which can be tested at the office....
> If he also has the WEP key he has the same access level as the faked user.
> The WEP key can be retrieved with tools like airsnort by sniffing a big
> amount of data from the WLAN.
>
Yep. Thats why all traffic over the network are encrypted VPN tunnels.
He/she can't use the internetconnection, but he/she can jam the local
network which much off local traffic.
Marcel
--
Posted by
news://news.nb.nu