Google Mail on your cell phone

Google Mail <http://mail.google.com/> (Gmail) now has a slick WAP interface
called Gmail Mobile that provides access to Gmail service from most
WAP-capable cell phones. Features:

* Free (other than carrier data charges)
* Full email functionality
* Handles attachments
* Optimized for different phones
* Can reply by calling if the contact is in your phone

For more information see <http://www.google.com/glm/gmail>.

Another great free Google service for cell phones is Google Local for Mobile
(GLM) <http://www.google.com/glm/>.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:41:41 GMT, in alt.internet.wireless , John
Navas <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Google Mail now has a slick WAP interface

why so you post this blatant advertising for google? Its not like they
can't advertise their own stuff. And as well as being spam, its also
offtopic.
Mark McIntyre
--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Mark McIntyre wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:41:41 GMT, in alt.internet.wireless , John
> Navas <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Google Mail now has a slick WAP interface
>
> why so you post this blatant advertising for google? Its not like they
> can't advertise their own stuff. And as well as being spam, its also
> offtopic.

Have you checked the group charter recently? It doesn't appear to be
off-topic.

Don't you have better things to do?
--
derek

[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <(E-Mail Removed)> on Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:46:40
+0000, Mark McIntyre <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:41:41 GMT, in alt.internet.wireless , John
>Navas <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Google Mail now has a slick WAP interface
>
>why so you post this blatant advertising for google? Its not like they
>can't advertise their own stuff.

I have no connection to Google and no axe to grind -- I'm just providing
useful information.

>And as well as being spam, its also
>offtopic.

Not spam. On-topic.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR ALT.INTERNET.WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/FAQ_for_alt.internet.wireless>

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:31:07 -0400, in alt.internet.wireless , Derek
Broughton <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Have you checked the group charter recently?

You mean the FAQ maintained by the guy whose posting I commented on?
This seems a mildly dubious reference.

>It doesn't appear to be off-topic.

I fail to see what an advert for google mail has to do with wireless.
If you can point me at an actual charter though I'd be grateful.

>Don't you have better things to do?

Than what? Comment on what I consider to be spam?
Mark McIntyre
--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <(E-Mail Removed)> on Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:23:25
+0000, Mark McIntyre <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:31:07 -0400, in alt.internet.wireless , Derek
>Broughton <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Have you checked the group charter recently?
>
>You mean the FAQ maintained by the guy whose posting I commented on?

I don't maintain it -- I just started it. It's a Wiki, which makes
maintenance a community effort. Feel free to contribute -- unless carping is
all you have time for.

>This seems a mildly dubious reference.

No, the charter.

>>It doesn't appear to be off-topic.
>
>I fail to see what an advert for google mail has to do with wireless.

It's not an advert -- it's a personal recommendation. You know the difference
-- right?

>If you can point me at an actual charter though I'd be grateful.

You claim I violated the charter, but you don't even know how to find it, much
less have actually read it?

>>Don't you have better things to do?
>
>Than what? Comment on what I consider to be spam?

All you accomplished was to draw attention. Was that your purpose?

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR ALT.INTERNET.WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/FAQ_for_alt.internet.wireless>

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:58:00 GMT, in alt.internet.wireless , John
Navas <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>>I fail to see what an advert for google mail has to do with wireless.

>It's not an advert -- it's a personal recommendation. You know the difference -- right?

Yes, and this was an advert. Call it a personal recommendation if you
like tho, its what pyramid sellers call their tripe too.

(I said)
>>If you can point me at an actual charter though I'd be grateful.
>
>You claim I violated the charter, but you don't even know how to find it, much
>less have actually read it?

No, I never claimed you violiated the charter. I said your post was
spam, and offtopic to boot. If you /can/ point me at the charter,
thatd be good. The FAQ doesn't mention it that I can see

>All you accomplished was to draw attention. Was that your purpose?

The attention was drawn by yourself and the other dude.
Mark McIntyre
--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Mark McIntyre wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:31:07 -0400, in alt.internet.wireless , Derek
> Broughton <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Have you checked the group charter recently?
>
> You mean the FAQ maintained by the guy whose posting I commented on?
> This seems a mildly dubious reference.

No, I mean the newsgroup charter. Every Usenet group has one. As for the
FAQ, I tend to disagree with John, often, so I'm glad the FAQ is _not_
maintained by John, it's maintained by anyone who wants to bother - I've
added my own parts.
--
derek

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:46:40 +0000, Mark McIntyre
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:41:41 GMT, in alt.internet.wireless , John
>Navas <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Google Mail now has a slick WAP interface
>
>why so you post this blatant advertising for google? Its not like they
>can't advertise their own stuff. And as well as being spam, its also
>offtopic.
>Mark McIntyre
>--
>
>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

So why do you keep posting the above off topic commercial spam
for Newsfeeds.Com in every one of your post? Pot>kettle>black?

[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <(E-Mail Removed)> on Sat, 28 Jan 2006 12:52:00
+0000, Mark McIntyre <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:58:00 GMT, in alt.internet.wireless , John
>Navas <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>>I fail to see what an advert for google mail has to do with wireless.
>
>>It's not an advert -- it's a personal recommendation. You know the difference -- right?
>
>Yes, and this was an advert. Call it a personal recommendation if you
>like tho, its what pyramid sellers call their tripe too.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.

>(I said)
>>>If you can point me at an actual charter though I'd be grateful.
>>
>>You claim I violated the charter, but you don't even know how to find it, much
>>less have actually read it?
>
>No, I never claimed you violiated the charter. I said your post was
>spam, and offtopic to boot.

The charter defines what is and is not on topic.

>If you /can/ point me at the charter,
>thatd be good.

It's pretty easy to find.

>The FAQ doesn't mention it that I can see

I just added it to the FAQ.

>>All you accomplished was to draw attention. Was that your purpose?
>
>The attention was drawn by yourself and the other dude.

Again, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR ALT.INTERNET.WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/FAQ_for_alt.internet.wireless>