There is no good reason to not broadcast the SSID anyway. It is not a valid security measure..
--
Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking)
Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the mutual benefit of all of us...
The MS-MVP Program -
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights...
"mikeFNB" <moc.dlrowltn@FNB7G-ekim> wrote in message news:Kp_Bd.810$(E-Mail Removed)...
> it's a known problem with some pc's after sp2.
> there wasa thread with a pointer to a knowledge base last week
>
> mike
>
> "Ken Wright" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Buffalo Air Station 125 on a desktop - Desktop is Win XP SP2. Laptop
>> (Win2K) has a Buffalo 125 Cardbus in it and works fine, connecting
>> automatically when booted up. I have WPA-AES enabled and all works fine.
> I
>> then tried switching off broadcasting the SSID and suddenly I can longer
>> connect to the internet on the laptop. I use an existing profile to
> connect
>> to the AP which as far as I can see is successful because I get a good
>> signal strength (Better than normal in fact), but just can't connect to
> the
>> web. Trouble is that I get a message that says Access Point not found,
> but
>> how can I be getting a good signal if no AP is found? As soon as I
>> re-enable broadcasting I can see the network from the laptop, can
> reconnect
>> and immediately see it renew the IP address, and can also then connect to
>> the web.
>>
>> I know that not broadcasting the SSID doesn't really do anything for
>> security and so can simply re-enable it, but it's bugging me as to why it
>> should do this.
>>
>> Any thoughts anyone???
>>
>> Regards
>> Ken...................
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>