On 04/04/11 19:29, kraftee wrote:
>
> "Andrew Benham" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:incqfg$ebi$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:55:39 +0000, Brian Mc wrote:
>>
>>> FTTC is implemented by siting FTTC/DSLAM boxes next to existing BT
>>> "green boxes" - where the trunk cables from the exchange link to
>>> customers lines.
>>
>> What puzzles me is that there's no existing green cabinet near where
>> this marking has appeared. It is at the entrance to a new housing
>> development (used to be a hospital), so perhaps BT predict there'll
>> be a good take-up of FTTC there.
>
> The placement of said green boxes is very random (so it appears) due to
> the normal shortsighted vision which the company bean counters typically
> display.
>
> As for the painting/marking, don't get your hopes up to high as they
> were on display nearly 6 months ago in north east Nottingham and yet
> nothing has been done yet. Whilst in the West Bridgford area the actual
> cabinets have been (randomly) scattered around for a few months now and
> still no service is being offered.
>
> It's all shaping up similarly to the ramshackle way the DSL service was
> released nationally all those years ago.
>
> So yes FTTC is on it's way, just don't hold your breath till it arrives ;-)
The paint appeared a 3 or 4 of weeks ago, next to the existing cabinet
serving my area - the checker gives a date of September. SAM has the
exchange as enabled and about 200m from my box they were uploading the
software for a cabinet a week ago. Unfortunately, they took the right
fork in the road first :-(
--
PeeGee
"Nothing should be able to load itself onto a computer without the
knowledge or consent of the computer user. Software should also be able
to be removed from a computer easily."
Peter Cullen, Microsoft Chief Privacy Strategist (Computing 18 Aug 05)
|