On 8 Mar 2006 16:42:12 -0800,
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>Jeff... Thank you for the kind words, but I wouldn't necessarily want
>to rely on WallWatcher to show unauthorized wireless usage (and I'm the
>WallWatcher author and I have a wireless router).
Very nice program that I use erratically for monitoring and watching
what going in and out of the router. Thanks much.
I've been using WallWatcher for traffic monitoring and intrusion
detection (in addition to MRTG, RRDTool, PRTG, and some home scribbled
Perl script) depending on the user and the router. As you indicated,
it's not intended for intrustion detection. One way I use all of
these (including Wallwatcher) is to look for unusual traffic at odd
times. That's not really an intrusion detection system, but a quick
glance at the graph will show that something is happening that doesn't
belong. Crude, but effective.
>First, not all routers can send log records in real-time to a computer
>on their LAN, and if the router can't do that, WallWatcher can't report
>anything at all. Increasingly, budget-priced routers lack this kind of
>logging capability.
True. The original poster didn't bother to specify their equipment. I
just assumed that it would be capeable of SNMP, or at least generating
SNMP traps for logging.
For simple wireless access points, I use a Linux/Unix box with
arpwatch or possibly arpsnmp.
http://linuxcommand.org/man_pages/arpwatch8.html
http://linuxcommand.org/man_pages/arpsnmp8.html
Any new IP or MAC address that appears on the LAN gets reported. The
catch is that it needs a seperate "management" server or run on a
Linux based WRT54G router.
>Second, even if the router can and does report internet activity and
>WallWatcher displays it, the user will have to do some analysis to
>figure out which reported events may be unauthorized activity.
I can see it now. A loud bell or alarm goes off in the middle of the
night announcing an intruder. I'm assuming a home user that doesn't
leave their wireless turned on all the time. Maybe that's a bad
assumption.
>The
>logs will show LAN IP addresses, wireless LAN IP addresses ("wLAN") and
>remote IP addresses. Those wLAN addresses sometimes may be used by
>authorized household members and sometimes by poachers, but since
>they're drawn from the same address pool, how can you know which is
>which?
You're right. You can't easily tell. The only way I can tell is by
the circumstantial evidence from unusual traffic at odd hours.
However, that begs the question what to do if one detects an intruder
with a spoofed MAC and spoofed IP. Even the best home intrusion
system will not be very useful unless the owner knows something about
how to lock people out of their system.
>I'm not saying it's impossible to figure this out, but it certainly
>isn't always easy. If you know there shouldn't have been any activity
>at certain times of the day, but there was, it's likely to have been
>poaching. But, to see those events in the log, you will have had to
>leave your logging computer running 'round the clock (or look in the
>router's internal logs). WallWatcher can't log when it's not running.
Ok, you talked me out of it for home users.
--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
(E-Mail Removed)
#
http://802.11junk.com (E-Mail Removed)
#
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS