Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Linux Networking > flow comparison USB vs PCMCIA

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

flow comparison USB vs PCMCIA

 
 
PenguinsAnonymous@notAchance.org
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-17-2007, 03:36 AM
I was wondering if anyone could explain the following observation?
I am comparing the data flow to the very same laptop having two
interfaces alternately configured.

asix chipset 10/100 USB 700KB/s (+-15)
3com 3C574 16bit 10/100 PCMCIA 880KB/s (smaller fluctuation)

So not really as bad as I thought but a very discernable difference.
It would appear you pay a high price for USB unless the implimentation
is poor?
This is a gentoo system 2.6.18 kernel.
The rate info was derived by copying the same dvd image from the same
server in the same room as laptop.
Each interface was using the same port in the switch. (ie I moved the
wire)
Could this be attributed to the magic or manipulation in the usb
bridging?
The asix chipset is in a targus USB dock.
http://www.targus.com/us/product_det...sp?sku=ACP45US
Or could this be the low horsepower of the laptop a 380XD thinkpad at
233mhz? Perhaps the usb is dependant more on horsepower than pcmcia due
to the externalization of the bus.

Thanks for any info.
-Walt

--
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speed up data flow BezzaV Windows Networking 0 09-27-2006 07:23 PM
Gigabit Ethernet and Flow Control ChrisW Windows Networking 0 06-22-2006 03:02 PM
Question about flow control over ethernet with TCP C. J. Clegg Linux Networking 3 05-06-2006 10:30 PM
Simple Question? - Flow Control =?Utf-8?B?R2FyeQ==?= Windows Networking 1 11-16-2004 03:58 AM
flow control - untypical, and very urgent! OM Linux Networking 0 07-01-2003 12:17 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11