Bill,
I have located the issue, but not the root of the problem. In the
past I have tried resolving the server, and it worked fine. The IP
pinged fine and the DNS and NetBIOS names resolved properly to the IP.
But, when I tried to map the drive it wouldn't work.
But, I ran through your directions anyhow in hopes I would figure
something out because from the way you and eddiec speak, it sounds
like my problem isn't the default behavior as I was assuming. When I
checked the details of the connection I realized the problem though.
The IP of the VPN server was different from the real IP of the server.
A few "oohhhhhh"s later and I checked the server's connections through
ipconfig. There is a connection called "PPP adapter RAS Server (Dial
In) Interface" that is descripted as "WAN (PPP/SLIP) Interface" that
contains the dial-in interface IP that differs from the NIC's IP.
Running through the Routing and Remote Access MSC I can see it is
called "Internal" for its LAN and Demand Dial name.
So, once I connect through the VPN the WINS server give me the real
IP of the server for the NetBIOS name and the DNS servers give me the
real IP for its DNS name ... but, it only accepts connections on the
IP assigned to it for the dial-in interface. This means that if I try
to connect through the \\ip of it, then I can browse the shares. At
least now I have a work around.
I am wondering if anyone knows if I can get rid of this behavior. I
would much prefer having the same IP for the dial-in interface as the
server's IP. The server is not supposed (as for network policy here)
to have two IPs.
Originally to set this up I used the Routing and Remote Access MSC.
I right clicked the server's name in the list and used "Configure and
Enable Routing and Remote Access". Next. Custom configuration (because
the VPN option from that menu requires two NICs). Tick VPN access box.
Finish. I am guessing this creates default policies that create the
behavior of having two IPs, or perhaps this is a required behavior.
I should also point out that I do not maintain the WINS server here
and the dial-in IP as well as the normal server IP are pingable from
the Internet. Only SMB traffic is blocked from the Internet. So when I
VPN in, the IP it receives from the WINS server is the IP I used to
dial-in to the VPN.
Any ideas? Thanks
Joseph Dowden
"Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
> The first thing to check is that you can access the server. When the
> client connects, click the icon in the system tray and click on Details.
> This will display the IP address of the server. Check that you can ping this
> IP. Next try to ping by server name. If that works, routing and name
> resolution are working.
>
> Browse the server wirh "net view \\servername" and try to map a share
> using "net use z: \\servername\filename" . If it complains about your
> username, use the username\password options in net use.
>
> "Vernalex" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed) om...
> > I currently have a Windows Server 2003 computer that is running routing
> and
> > remote access to provide access from outside our network. The benefit of
> > this is that NetBIOS/SMB ports are blocked at our WAN router, but we can
> use
> > a VPN to gain secure access to SMB shares that are inside the network.
> >
> > The computer hosting the VPN is a simple machine. It is not on an active
> > directory and it does little else than share resources. So, to set up the
> > VPN I used the Routing and Remote Access Server setup wizard. Since I only
> > have a single NIC I used the custom configuration and selected the VPN
> > access. This then allowed me to access the network from offsite using the
> > default policies set by the wizard.
> >
> > But, I have come across a problem. The VPN connects just fine. And when
> > connected I receive an IP from the server's LAN. I can then access other
> > computers on that network. However, when I try to connect to a Windows
> share
> > on the VPN server it fails to get a response from the server. I first
> > thought this may be a security issue, but now I am not sure. A friend of
> > mine with Small Business Server 2003 doesn't have this problem. I have
> read
> > books on this subject, searched the web and the usenet, and asked people
> > that I thought would know... but, I haven't been able to come up with an
> > answer.
> >
> > If anyone has an answer then please let me know. Thanks