A few VPN questions

On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 04:06:36 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio wrote:

> To Mr. Tom Giarmo,
>
> I see that your thread recieved a rude reply from DasFox.
>
> I haven't see you post in these groups before so allow me to try
> to explain DasFox:
>
> DF is an insecure adolescent (12-14yo) who proclaims himself a
> 'tech'.

I post to Wilders so I know this is a lie.

*plonk*

On 2/3/2011 10:10 PM, rwalker wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 04:06:36 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>> To Mr. Tom Giarmo,
>>
>> I see that your thread recieved a rude reply from DasFox.
>>
>> I haven't see you post in these groups before so allow me to try
>> to explain DasFox:
>>
>> DF is an insecure adolescent (12-14yo) who proclaims himself a
>> 'tech'.
>
> I post to Wilders so I know this is a lie.
>
> *plonk*

I post to Wilders, as well.

The OP's comments are absolutely valid.

flush post

Troll

On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:45:45 +0100 (CET), Anne Onime wrote:

> On 2/3/2011 10:10 PM, rwalker wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 04:06:36 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>
>>> To Mr. Tom Giarmo,
>>>
>>> I see that your thread recieved a rude reply from DasFox.
>>>
>>> I haven't see you post in these groups before so allow me to try
>>> to explain DasFox:
>>>
>>> DF is an insecure adolescent (12-14yo) who proclaims himself a
>>> 'tech'.
>>
>> I post to Wilders so I know this is a lie.
>>
>> *plonk*
>
> I fuck my mother and my sister.
>
> My comments are absolutely valid.
>
> and they swallow
>
> My Troll cum

Pictures...?

THANKS
--
Gays make sick attempt at Harry Potter
http://www.methodshop.com/gadgets/re...-stick/big.jpg
https://ari.jottit.com/ YOU want to be next...? Fuck with 'FOX then...
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.ph...9&postcount=25
Anybody with an internet connection, 5 grand, an iq above room
temperature and basic literacy can grow outstanding cannabis.

On 2/4/2011 6:45 AM, Anne Onime wrote:

>
> I post to Wilders, as well.

Since you also post as Nomen Nescio I would think at least that claim is
accurate...

On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:57:19 -0500, George wrote:

> On 2/4/2011 6:45 AM, Anne Onime wrote:
>
>>
>> I post to Wilders, as well.
>
> Since you also post as Nomen Nescio I would think at least that claim is
> accurate...

Identifying anonymous posters is akin to matching eyeless cats. They
look alike, walk and "talk" alike, yet, as the day closes, when you
can't see their eyes, you are only left with speculation...and a
filing cabinet _crammed_ with circumstantial evidence. ;0)
--
(E-Mail Removed)
http://heremypants.weebly.com/

I followed the instructions at is-not-my.name and set up a nym with
mixnym.net.

Then I looked up more instructions, I forget where, and sent a
message trhough mixnym.net to my correspondent along with my public
key. He sent me his public key to aam and I found the message using
the neat utility for windows.

Then we just use aam and encrypt the messages so that the nym
operator and canont read them.

On 2/5/2011 4:16 PM, heirophant wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:57:19 -0500, George wrote:
>
>> On 2/4/2011 6:45 AM, Anne Onime wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I post to Wilders, as well.
>>
>> Since you also post as Nomen Nescio I would think at least that claim is
>> accurate...
>
> Identifying anonymous posters is akin to matching eyeless cats. They
> look alike, walk and "talk" alike, yet, as the day closes, when you
> can't see their eyes, you are only left with speculation...and a
> filing cabinet _crammed_ with circumstantial evidence. ;0)

Except if folks give themselves away by the content they post...

I think it is very childish for someone to decide they need to have an
anonymous version of themselves.

On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:19:24 -0500, George wrote:

> On 2/5/2011 4:16 PM, heirophant wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:57:19 -0500, George wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/4/2011 6:45 AM, Anne Onime wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I post to Wilders, as well.
>>>
>>> Since you also post as Nomen Nescio I would think at least that claim is
>>> accurate...
>>
>> Identifying anonymous posters is akin to matching eyeless cats. They
>> look alike, walk and "talk" alike, yet, as the day closes, when you
>> can't see their eyes, you are only left with speculation...and a
>> filing cabinet _crammed_ with circumstantial evidence. ;0)
>
> Except if folks give themselves away by the content they post...
>
> I think it is very childish for someone to decide they need to have an
> anonymous version of themselves.

I bow you your discretion, sir.
--
(E-Mail Removed)
http://heremypants.weebly.com/