On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:57:50 -0800 (PST), BigMike82
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
<7603d8f9-965d-4f94-bf6e-(E-Mail Removed)>:
>My facility will be hosting a conference with about 300 people, and
>we're expecting about 300 people to show up. We're estimating 250-300
>concurrent connections. From an RF standpoint, it's easy coverage.
>We have a large amphitheater-style hall with an outdoor patio, so
>coverage is easy.
>
>It's the sheer amount of connections I'm worried about. We're
>planning on deploying 12 Cisco 1132AGs. We'll have a 10 Megabit
>connection available, which, unfortunately, is a lot slower than I
>like. That's something I'm working on with the guys upstairs. A few
>of the APs need to cover the outside, where we'll be using Powerline
>Ethernet to hook them into our network.
>
>Are a dozen APs enough for this? Should we get more? Less?
>
>Any other thoughts or advice is much appreciated.
I don't think the number of access point is unreasonable. What I'd
worry about is physically placing them so clients get spread more or
less evenly. If you try to make it one big wireless network, my
experience is that too many participants will get connected to too few
access points. You might want to have two or even four wireless
networks, and allocate participants evenly between networks. I also
suggest using WPA Enterprise to secure all connections from each other,
and to keep the outside out.
--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
|