fail access shared folder via alias hostname

After upgrade to windows server 2003 i can not access the shared folder via
other alias name. the Scenario :

i have one server 2000 with name HOST1 and ip 10.10.10.10 and i create an
alias name HOST to point to 10.10.10.10 ... it works fine
after upgrade i can not access the shared using HOST , i should access using
HOST1 ... i have many application depend to access using HOST !!!

what shall i do ???

It shouldn't work by default on any Windows Server. To get SMB access via a
cname working you need to disable strict name checking on the lanmanserver
service.

See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281308

Cheers,
Jeremy.

But then I ran across this:

http://www.itnewsgroups.net/group/mi...topic2811.aspx

But I am sure I have got this working on WS03SP1 before.



"ali" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:6F6A7822-2E91-4687-9426-(E-Mail Removed)...
> After upgrade to windows server 2003 i can not access the shared folder
> via
> other alias name. the Scenario :
>
> i have one server 2000 with name HOST1 and ip 10.10.10.10 and i create an
> alias name HOST to point to 10.10.10.10 ... it works fine
> after upgrade i can not access the shared using HOST , i should access
> using
> HOST1 ... i have many application depend to access using HOST !!!
>
> what shall i do ???

the changes in the registry shoul be made in the host that i cann't access
,,,,


"Jeremy" wrote:

> It shouldn't work by default on any Windows Server. To get SMB access via a
> cname working you need to disable strict name checking on the lanmanserver
> service.
>
> See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281308
>
> Cheers,
> Jeremy.
>
> But then I ran across this:
>
> http://www.itnewsgroups.net/group/mi...topic2811.aspx
>
> But I am sure I have got this working on WS03SP1 before.
>
>
>
> "ali" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:6F6A7822-2E91-4687-9426-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > After upgrade to windows server 2003 i can not access the shared folder
> > via
> > other alias name. the Scenario :
> >
> > i have one server 2000 with name HOST1 and ip 10.10.10.10 and i create an
> > alias name HOST to point to 10.10.10.10 ... it works fine
> > after upgrade i can not access the shared using HOST , i should access
> > using
> > HOST1 ... i have many application depend to access using HOST !!!
> >
> > what shall i do ???
>

The changes need to be made on the server that you are trying to access via
the alias.
"ali" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:1494C70C-A359-4E17-BD5D-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> the changes in the registry shoul be made in the host that i cann't access
> ,,,,
>
>
> "Jeremy" wrote:
>
>> It shouldn't work by default on any Windows Server. To get SMB access
>> via a
>> cname working you need to disable strict name checking on the
>> lanmanserver
>> service.
>>
>> See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281308
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jeremy.
>>
>> But then I ran across this:
>>
>> http://www.itnewsgroups.net/group/mi...topic2811.aspx
>>
>> But I am sure I have got this working on WS03SP1 before.
>>
>>
>>
>> "ali" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:6F6A7822-2E91-4687-9426-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > After upgrade to windows server 2003 i can not access the shared folder
>> > via
>> > other alias name. the Scenario :
>> >
>> > i have one server 2000 with name HOST1 and ip 10.10.10.10 and i create
>> > an
>> > alias name HOST to point to 10.10.10.10 ... it works fine
>> > after upgrade i can not access the shared using HOST , i should access
>> > using
>> > HOST1 ... i have many application depend to access using HOST !!!
>> >
>> > what shall i do ???
>>