Possible negatives:
1. May require a high-gain outdoor antenna at your home to get good signal
in both directions - which means you may not be able to get reliable
performance if you are not at home.
2. May not support security (at least not yet). One long-range wifi provider
in my area is not WPA-capable, and does not provide WEP for the same reason
hotspots do not use it. If you're comfortable without security, that's your
lookout - but I think it's an unacceptable risk for a service I'd be using
all the time. Maybe you're lucky, and they do WPA or have a VPN backend.
Unless the provider dedicates an entire channel to just you, you also
consider the following.
3. Find out if there will be bandwidth usage restrictions. You'll be sharing
the channel with a lot more stations then you would be in your home net. A
few guys streaming video could deplete the useable bandwidth in a hurry.
If's there's no restrictions, then your "mileage may vary". If there are
restrictions, they apply to you too.
4. Unlike a home net, the other stations almost certainly can't hear you,
and you can't hear them. So I'm guessing they'll use RTS/CTS to co-ordinate
traffic and solve the hidden-node problem. In fact, if they are offering
802.11g service, then there will certainly be 802.11b clients in the mix.
RTS/CTS is necessary to prevent serious performance degradation in that
case. Point is, RTS/CTS adds its own overhead that reduces overall
throughput.
I'm not saying the wifi ISP wouldn't be adequate for your needs. If you
don't need more than 1 or 2 Mbps (all you'd get via a cable modem anway),
and your network cell is not overloaded with other users, you probably won't
care. But in the worst case, your bandwidth could erode as new users come
online, and you forfeit all control.
"Marshall Karp" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Nnxqb.1680$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Like most of you, I got high speed internet, bought the cable modem, and
> wireless networking router. This was to set-up my home so we could move
> around anywhere inside and out with our laptops.
>
> However, an ISP in our area will be setting up a big tower and setting up
> the wireless network so the signal reaches three miles. The cost will be
> $34.95 a month.
>
> What does this mean? Instead of getting on the internet at home, my wife
> and I could be anywhere in town. Also, my high speed set-up is only at my
> home. At my office, I still use my dial-up account, so I am paying about
> double for two services. This ISP comes in, I can dumped the cable and
> dial-up and get high speed internet at home or at the office or at the
park
> or in my car, whereever.
>
> So, don't do like I did, jump in right away and spend the money on the
modem
> and router. See if your internet service provider is making plans to set
up
> your towns and areas for wireless networking.
>
> Now, I may have listed the positives, as best as I know it. I would
> appreciate it if someone lists the negatives to this areawide wireless
> internet.
>
>
|