Snowbat <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
>
>> Snowbat <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>For example, the default Linksys WRT54G DHCP pool is
>>>192.168.1.100 to 192.168.1.149 so you are free to use 192.168.1.2 to
>>>192.168.1.99 (and 150 to 254) for fixed IP addresses.
>>
>> With a Linksys WRT54G, that will be a problem! I'm not sure
>> what the Linksys is doing to accomplish this, but it will not
>> route to addresses outside the range that its DHCP server will
>> assign.
>
>This was certainly not a problem for my WRT54G running Linksys firmware
>1.42.2 (until very recently the latest available for the ETSI model). My
The way this typically manifests itself is that you try to
connect to the HTTP server of a brand new WRT54G using a host
that has no interface with an IP address in the range served up
by the WRT54G's DHCP server. The interface lights blink, and it
is obvious that each command causes a significant amount of
traffic, but no response...
Until an interface on that host has an IP address which is
within the appropriate range, and then all works just fine.
Obviously if you just happen to be using an IP address within
that range, or if you get an IP address with DHCP, you'll never
notice it does that.
I have not checked the newer releases from Linksys, so I can't
be positive that they didn't change that. I think mine were all
back about firmware version 1.37 or some such.
>WRT54G now runs Sveasoft Alchemy V1.0 and no problem there either.
I don't recall ever checking to see if it does the same thing or
not.
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
(E-Mail Removed)