Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > Ethernet question

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Ethernet question

 
 
Petert
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 01:00 PM
Possibly a little off topic, but can anyone tell me what size pipe
would be required to carry 100Mbit or Gigabit Ethernet between two
locations? The cct wouldn't be shared with anyone else, one site would
be connected exclusively to the corporate network box (whatever that
may be) about 150 miles away

I am assuming there is no correlation between say a 100Gbit ethernet
and an STM1 cct - i.e. I wouldn't need a 155Mb cct to carry it, but
I'm more than a little confused and am finding it difficult to find
the info

--
Cheers

Peter
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Chris Hills
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 01:29 PM
On 09/01/09 15:00, Petert wrote:
> Possibly a little off topic, but can anyone tell me what size pipe
> would be required to carry 100Mbit or Gigabit Ethernet between two
> locations? The cct wouldn't be shared with anyone else, one site would
> be connected exclusively to the corporate network box (whatever that
> may be) about 150 miles away
>
> I am assuming there is no correlation between say a 100Gbit ethernet
> and an STM1 cct - i.e. I wouldn't need a 155Mb cct to carry it, but
> I'm more than a little confused and am finding it difficult to find
> the info


Er, so order a dedicated fast/gigabit ethernet circuit then? BT, CW and
Virgin Business (or Telewest Business if they are still called that)
will supply such a service.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Petert
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 01:32 PM
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:29:12 +0100, Chris Hills <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>On 09/01/09 15:00, Petert wrote:
>> Possibly a little off topic, but can anyone tell me what size pipe
>> would be required to carry 100Mbit or Gigabit Ethernet between two
>> locations? The cct wouldn't be shared with anyone else, one site would
>> be connected exclusively to the corporate network box (whatever that
>> may be) about 150 miles away
>>
>> I am assuming there is no correlation between say a 100Gbit ethernet
>> and an STM1 cct - i.e. I wouldn't need a 155Mb cct to carry it, but
>> I'm more than a little confused and am finding it difficult to find
>> the info

>
>Er, so order a dedicated fast/gigabit ethernet circuit then? BT, CW and
>Virgin Business (or Telewest Business if they are still called that)
>will supply such a service.


Not as simple as that - the agreement I have with our IT types is that
they will supply the box if I source the cct. I have access to ccts
between 2Mb and upwards - I just need to know what size I need.
--
Cheers

Peter
 
Reply With Quote
 
Gordon Henderson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 01:49 PM
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
Petert <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:29:12 +0100, Chris Hills <(E-Mail Removed)>
>wrote:
>
>>On 09/01/09 15:00, Petert wrote:
>>> Possibly a little off topic, but can anyone tell me what size pipe
>>> would be required to carry 100Mbit or Gigabit Ethernet between two
>>> locations? The cct wouldn't be shared with anyone else, one site would
>>> be connected exclusively to the corporate network box (whatever that
>>> may be) about 150 miles away
>>>
>>> I am assuming there is no correlation between say a 100Gbit ethernet
>>> and an STM1 cct - i.e. I wouldn't need a 155Mb cct to carry it, but
>>> I'm more than a little confused and am finding it difficult to find
>>> the info

>>
>>Er, so order a dedicated fast/gigabit ethernet circuit then? BT, CW and
>>Virgin Business (or Telewest Business if they are still called that)
>>will supply such a service.

>
>Not as simple as that - the agreement I have with our IT types is that
>they will supply the box if I source the cct. I have access to ccts
>between 2Mb and upwards - I just need to know what size I need.


You need a 100Mb or Gb leased line circuit. These are standard BT
offerings. Do be prepared to pay for them though. BT will install fibre
at each end and give you a terminator box with an ethernet socket to
plug into.

(My experience of them is that they're not auto-sensing either, so do
make sure you have kit that you can fix the speed and duplex settings on!)

Or they'll try to sell you into their MPLS network, but just say no,
if all you really need is point to point,

Gordon
 
Reply With Quote
 
Petert
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 01:54 PM
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:49:09 +0000 (UTC), Gordon Henderson
<gordon+(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
>Petert <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:29:12 +0100, Chris Hills <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On 09/01/09 15:00, Petert wrote:
>>>> Possibly a little off topic, but can anyone tell me what size pipe
>>>> would be required to carry 100Mbit or Gigabit Ethernet between two
>>>> locations? The cct wouldn't be shared with anyone else, one site would
>>>> be connected exclusively to the corporate network box (whatever that
>>>> may be) about 150 miles away
>>>>
>>>> I am assuming there is no correlation between say a 100Gbit ethernet
>>>> and an STM1 cct - i.e. I wouldn't need a 155Mb cct to carry it, but
>>>> I'm more than a little confused and am finding it difficult to find
>>>> the info
>>>
>>>Er, so order a dedicated fast/gigabit ethernet circuit then? BT, CW and
>>>Virgin Business (or Telewest Business if they are still called that)
>>>will supply such a service.

>>
>>Not as simple as that - the agreement I have with our IT types is that
>>they will supply the box if I source the cct. I have access to ccts
>>between 2Mb and upwards - I just need to know what size I need.

>
>You need a 100Mb or Gb leased line circuit. These are standard BT
>offerings. Do be prepared to pay for them though. BT will install fibre
>at each end and give you a terminator box with an ethernet socket to
>plug into.
>
>(My experience of them is that they're not auto-sensing either, so do
>make sure you have kit that you can fix the speed and duplex settings on!)
>
>Or they'll try to sell you into their MPLS network, but just say no,
>if all you really need is point to point,
>
>Gordon


Thanks for your reply - I will be able to provide the cct myself,
without going to BT - but I need to know what size cct I will need -
what is needed to carry a 100Mb or Gb ethernet?
--
Cheers

Peter
 
Reply With Quote
 
The Natural Philosopher
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 02:05 PM
Petert wrote:
> Possibly a little off topic, but can anyone tell me what size pipe
> would be required to carry 100Mbit or Gigabit Ethernet between two
> locations? The cct wouldn't be shared with anyone else, one site would
> be connected exclusively to the corporate network box (whatever that
> may be) about 150 miles away
>


Cooer missus,. A fucking EXPENSIVE pipe.


> I am assuming there is no correlation between say a 100Gbit ethernet
> and an STM1 cct - i.e. I wouldn't need a 155Mb cct to carry it, but
> I'm more than a little confused and am finding it difficult to find
> the info
>

You would need something like a 155mBit to carry it. Or a private fibre :-)

I am not sure what BT or energis would offer you in this mode.

A frame relay connection would do it in burst, if that is the issue. I
think.

But realistically if you have 100Mbps in a local lan, the usual solution
is to work out what actually needs transferring and what rate is
acceptable. Without knowing whats going on, my approach to situations
like his was usually to construct a lower bandwidth link, and modify the
applications either side to make efficient use of it.

If you can hint at what runs over it, I might be able to suggest
alternatives.


 
Reply With Quote
 
The Natural Philosopher
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 02:06 PM
Petert wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:49:09 +0000 (UTC), Gordon Henderson
> <gordon+(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
>> Petert <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:29:12 +0100, Chris Hills <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/01/09 15:00, Petert wrote:
>>>>> Possibly a little off topic, but can anyone tell me what size pipe
>>>>> would be required to carry 100Mbit or Gigabit Ethernet between two
>>>>> locations? The cct wouldn't be shared with anyone else, one site would
>>>>> be connected exclusively to the corporate network box (whatever that
>>>>> may be) about 150 miles away
>>>>>
>>>>> I am assuming there is no correlation between say a 100Gbit ethernet
>>>>> and an STM1 cct - i.e. I wouldn't need a 155Mb cct to carry it, but
>>>>> I'm more than a little confused and am finding it difficult to find
>>>>> the info
>>>> Er, so order a dedicated fast/gigabit ethernet circuit then? BT, CW and
>>>> Virgin Business (or Telewest Business if they are still called that)
>>>> will supply such a service.
>>> Not as simple as that - the agreement I have with our IT types is that
>>> they will supply the box if I source the cct. I have access to ccts
>>> between 2Mb and upwards - I just need to know what size I need.

>> You need a 100Mb or Gb leased line circuit. These are standard BT
>> offerings. Do be prepared to pay for them though. BT will install fibre
>> at each end and give you a terminator box with an ethernet socket to
>> plug into.
>>
>> (My experience of them is that they're not auto-sensing either, so do
>> make sure you have kit that you can fix the speed and duplex settings on!)
>>
>> Or they'll try to sell you into their MPLS network, but just say no,
>> if all you really need is point to point,
>>
>> Gordon

>
> Thanks for your reply - I will be able to provide the cct myself,
> without going to BT - but I need to know what size cct I will need -
> what is needed to carry a 100Mb or Gb ethernet?


Fiber or microwave over any distance.

100mb of course. If you dont want degradation ..
 
Reply With Quote
 
The Natural Philosopher
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 03:09 PM
R. Mark Clayton wrote:
> Unless you REALLY need this just have a smaller pipe between the two
> locations.
>
> even ADSL might do.
>
>


On one per desk basis, you could have each user with 448k/3Mbps..

Thats actually very usable. ;-)

It all depends on what's gong on between..

I think one of the biggest private (non ISP) pipes I ever worked on was
an Internet based pipe between London and new York. Guess what. Getty
Images..massive data flow of high res pictures.

We built a mirror system IIRC so that images uploaded in one location
got transferred more or less when bandwidth was available to the other.

Do the bulk transfers in the wee small hours when both towns are asleep.

the worst thing for a network is MS servers - file servers.

Now I can and do run SMB over a 30KBytes/secondlink, but its dog slow.
Its dog slow at 10Mbps :-).

I generally pull the files I want across, make a coffee, then when they
arrive, work on them, and put them back later.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Stephen Ward
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 05:02 PM
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:49:09 +0000, Gordon Henderson wrote:

> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Petert
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:29:12 +0100, Chris Hills <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>On 09/01/09 15:00, Petert wrote:
>>>> Possibly a little off topic, but can anyone tell me what size pipe
>>>> would be required to carry 100Mbit or Gigabit Ethernet between two
>>>> locations? The cct wouldn't be shared with anyone else, one site
>>>> would be connected exclusively to the corporate network box (whatever
>>>> that may be) about 150 miles away
>>>>
>>>> I am assuming there is no correlation between say a 100Gbit ethernet
>>>> and an STM1 cct - i.e. I wouldn't need a 155Mb cct to carry it, but
>>>> I'm more than a little confused and am finding it difficult to find
>>>> the info
>>>
>>>Er, so order a dedicated fast/gigabit ethernet circuit then? BT, CW and
>>>Virgin Business (or Telewest Business if they are still called that)
>>>will supply such a service.

>>
>>Not as simple as that - the agreement I have with our IT types is that
>>they will supply the box if I source the cct. I have access to ccts
>>between 2Mb and upwards - I just need to know what size I need.

>
> You need a 100Mb or Gb leased line circuit. These are standard BT
> offerings. Do be prepared to pay for them though. BT will install fibre
> at each end and give you a terminator box with an ethernet socket to
> plug into.
>
> (My experience of them is that they're not auto-sensing either, so do
> make sure you have kit that you can fix the speed and duplex settings
> on!)
>
> Or they'll try to sell you into their MPLS network, but just say no, if
> all you really need is point to point,
>
> Gordon


AFAIR a long time ago when I did Cisco stuff, is it not only Workstations
that should are 'acceptable' to be auto-negotiate and everything else
should be fixed. BT being BT would probably say 'well, it's what Cisco
say' - like they do. I just wish I could find the old Cisco text where I
read it all those years ago. I'm sure Gordon has it somewhere ;-)



--
.. . .
 
Reply With Quote
 
Petert
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-09-2009, 06:16 PM
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:05:20 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>Petert wrote:
>> Possibly a little off topic, but can anyone tell me what size pipe
>> would be required to carry 100Mbit or Gigabit Ethernet between two
>> locations? The cct wouldn't be shared with anyone else, one site would
>> be connected exclusively to the corporate network box (whatever that
>> may be) about 150 miles away
>>

>
>Cooer missus,. A fucking EXPENSIVE pipe.
>
>
>> I am assuming there is no correlation between say a 100Gbit ethernet
>> and an STM1 cct - i.e. I wouldn't need a 155Mb cct to carry it, but
>> I'm more than a little confused and am finding it difficult to find
>> the info
>>

>You would need something like a 155mBit to carry it. Or a private fibre :-)
>
>I am not sure what BT or energis would offer you in this mode.
>
>A frame relay connection would do it in burst, if that is the issue. I
>think.
>
>But realistically if you have 100Mbps in a local lan, the usual solution
>is to work out what actually needs transferring and what rate is
>acceptable. Without knowing whats going on, my approach to situations
>like his was usually to construct a lower bandwidth link, and modify the
>applications either side to make efficient use of it.
>
>If you can hint at what runs over it, I might be able to suggest
>alternatives.
>


I would be looking to hang four or five PC's max on it. Three of these
would have to be able to access 3 or 4 remote servers that carry real
time info and all would have to be able to do the usual internet,
intranet and email. Two of the servers are some sort of Unix while the
other two are Windows types. may possibly want to add access to two
more servers within the next 12 months.

At Present we use a 2mb pipe which is shared by two other geographical
locations and is really slow - my IT dept has promised that if I can
provide the pipe, they will provide the kit to hang on my end of it. I
can probably find a spare STM1, but if I can get away with something
smaller, all the better. I don't need to go to C&W or BT etc, but I do
need to know what size pipe I need to arrange 0- this ethernet thing
is very puzzling :-)
--
Cheers

Peter
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ethernet/USB Modem Question NastyNiff Home Networking 3 07-10-2005 12:09 AM
Ethernet Over AC Question Wizzard Home Networking 5 01-26-2005 05:52 PM
Ethernet Bridging Question Mark Linux Networking 0 04-03-2004 12:25 PM
Need help! Raw ethernet socket question Michael Mueller Linux Networking 2 10-07-2003 11:18 AM
Power over ethernet question John Osmond Wireless Internet 8 07-11-2003 02:19 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11