On 15 Jul 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in article
<(E-Mail Removed) .com>, michanux wrote:
] On 11 Jul 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in article
] <(E-Mail Removed)>, I wrote:
>>On 10 Jul 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in article
>><1152563399.101092.240...@75g2000cwc.googlegroup s.com>, michanux wrote:
>>>The answer of 'nslookup michael.zuhause.de' is:
>>
>>working OK
>>>Neither 'ping' nor 'ftp michael.zuhause.de' find the address but 'ping
>>192.168.1.12' and 'ftp 192.168.1.12' are successfull.
>>(Explanation: DNS tools like 'dig' 'dnsquery', 'host' and 'nslookup' ignore
/etc/host.conf and /etc/nsswitch.conf, but gethostbyname(3) checks those
when making a lookup.
>All the files are the way you figure out. Meanwhile I got an new
>suspicion.
>'named' started at The beginning of the session by '/etc/rc.local'. But
>should I open a special port for an additional daemon in '/etc/inetd.conf'
No - you can only run the daemon out of one place (the normal would be a
a runlevel script, such as /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S55named - lacking that,
then running it out of rc.local is OK). Trying to run it out of inetd.conf
is _most_ unusual (I don't think I've ever seen it done by any regular
distribution), and will cause grief because the same port can not be
accessed by two or more daemons at the same time.
Try using 'strace' to see where things are barfing. Try
strace -eopen ping michael.zuhause.de
which _might_ give clues about the failure.
Old guy
|