"Mike Bailey" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> When you say that you reduced the load on the DC, what did you do? This
> sounds very likely also since that one server is doing everything PDC, AD,
> DHCP, DNS... Could I solve this by using my second 2003 server as a
> secondary DC?
That is not a heavey load. Both my DCs (which are identical) do AD, DHCP,
DNS, and WINS. My DCs are only running on single-10/100 Nics, P2-350's with
256 meg or RAM,...and they do fine on a system of about 100 machines.
> As for the NIC possibility, how would I know if this was the case? And if
> it was, does this mean just getting a higher end NIC, or can I do
> something like run two NICS?
No, two nics would create a disaster.
You can't always blame software!
Looking over the posts it seems to me you might have a failing switch. It
would be a switch that was located in such a way that all traffic would stop
if it failed.
Next time it happens, yank the power on the suspected switch and plug it
back in (effectively reboot it) and see if it picks up again. The LEDs on
the switch may or may not help,..they may blink when the port recieves
traffic but that doesn't mean the traffic is getting over the switch's
Backplane through the processing between the ports.
You could also have a failing cable, or EM interferrence with a cable
depending on what the cable comes close to along the way. If it passes a
high EM source along the way where that EM Source is "on & off" then when it
is on connectivity fails, it goes off connectivity resumes. Also bad
cables, pinched/kinked cables, or failing cables will be more sensitive to
EM than a good cable would be.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com