Thanks for the reply Bill!
To address the naming issue we have assigned names and ip addresses in the
servers host files. The servers work correctly for backup over the isolated
switch, but the workstation Mac OS X clients on our LAN can no longer connect
to the file server (over 1st NIC) with the second NIC enabled.
"Bill Grant" wrote:
> That is pretty much what I would expect to happen. Enabling a second NIC
> on a server usually fouls up the name resolution. Your server now has two IP
> addresses associated with its name. Since most backup solutions also rely on
> names to find machines, your scheme is most unlikely to work.
>
> "Joe" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:A1648C8E-FA69-40F7-85E7-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >I am trying to enable both network cards on my file server. One for the
> > public LAN, and one for an isolated "backup" network consisting of just
> > servers.
> >
> > Enabling the secondary NIC on file server prevents the MAC OS X computers
> > from connecting to the file server. Disabling the Secondary NIC allows the
> > MACs to reconnect. Windows workstations can connect and use resources
> > correctly.
> > Server can not print to network printers or route out to the internet with
> > secondary Nic enabled.
> > MACs use regular TCP/IP to connect. Appletalk and File sharing for Apples
> > is
> > not enabled.
> >
> > Windows Server 2003 Appliance Edition SP1 (Dell PowerVault NAS O/S
> > 3.4.9.2)
> >
> > Primary NIC plugged into network switch
> > Secondary NIC plugged into isolated switch (for server to server backups)
> >
> > Primary NIC has static domain class C IP address and configuration
> > (DNS/WINS
> > & Gateway)
> > Secondary NIC has static class B IP address, no WINS, points to self for
> > DNS
> > Neither connection is using Windows Firewall or any other firewall.
> >
> > Can you help point me in the right direction to get this configured
> > correctly? Thanks!
> >
>
>
>
|