(E-Mail Removed) wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com:
> What's the difference? I have a di-624 router, I am able to
> connect the 2100ap via ClientAP or ptpBridge to the root AP (the
> di-624). Why would anyone choose one over the other? This does
> not seem to be made clear.
A point-to-point bridge requires a mating pair of devices each
configured in Bridge mode. This configuration is intended to connect
two remote Ethernet segments. It operates like a very long, but
wireless, Ethernet cable.
> Also, on the 2100ap side, would another router be required for
> multiple ethernet devices?
No
> I tried to replace the router with a
> switch and everything was going super slow and timing out. Is it
> possible for multiple devices to use the 2100ap without nat? (i.e.
> di-624 - - -> 2100ap ----> swtitch ----> devices)
This should be fine with the DWL-2100AP in Wireless Client (AP
Client) mode, although you may need to be running the current
firmware.
Hope this helps
--
Richard Perkin
To email me, change the AT in the address below
richard.perkinATmyrealbox.com
It's is not, it isn't ain't, and it's it's, not its, if you mean it
is. If you don't, it's its. Then too, it's hers. It isn't her's.
It isn't our's either. It's ours, and likewise yours and theirs.
-- Oxford University Press, Edpress News