NETBIOS only allows for a single name for a system.
You can't use DNS cnames, lmhosts or anything like that to
work around this as the limitation exists above IP.
There is an unsupported (but widely-known) registry hack
you can use to assign multiple NetBIOS names to a server:
Browse regedt32 on the server to
HKLM \ System \ CurrentControlSet \ Services \ LanManServer \ Parameters
and create a REG_MUL:TI_SZ entry called OptionalNames and put in the list
of all the alias names you want to assign to the server. Then reboot.
Again, this is entirely unsupported by MS and I've never tried it on Win2K3 so
it may not work at all. And if you are running WINS you may need to
make manual entries for some of these names also, I'm not sure -- check the WINS
db after the server boots and/or use nbtstat to check.
Steve Duff, MCSE
Ergodic Systems, Inc.
"RS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:083d01c3c33b$0e514600$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Over the weekend we had some of our guys rebuild one of
> our NT 4.0 BDCs (NT domain) as a Win2003 member server in
> our new AD domain. It was also renamed in the process.
>
> They cnamed the old hostname to the newhostname (e.g.,
> A.NTdomain.com ---> B.ADdomain.com) due to having some
> apps hard coded with the old server name.
>
> I came in this morning and found that the apps that had
> the UNC name hard codded for the old server werent
> working. The error they are receiving is:
>
> "You were not connected because a duplicate name exists
> on the network."
>
> These are apps in the NT domain.
>
> We are running WINS and made sure WINS was cleared out.
> I also removed the old server account from the NT
> domain.
>
> I have flushed the netbios cache on the local boxes and
> the wins servers. I have double checked the server IP
> properties to make sure the settings were correct.
>
> I ran nbtstat -a <server> name and received host not
> found. I ran "net view <server>" and received the
> same "duplicate name exists.." error.
>
> At this point, we should be receiving host not found if
> anything. I am at a loss now.
>
> The desired result is to have this "duplicate name"
> problem fixed so that both names resolve to the new
> server. The thought is that if we remove the old server
> entry from WINS (which has been done), wins would then
> forward the name on to DNS and dns would resolve the name-
> -hence the cname.
>
> However, I am all out of ideas on how to fix the
> duplicate name issue.
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated
>
> Thanks
> RS
>
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
>
>
>
|