Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > Dumb ISA server question regarding printing

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Dumb ISA server question regarding printing

 
 
Bob
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-20-2005, 09:57 PM
Customer has three locations, a main office and two branch offices. Branch
office 1 has only one computer and one printer . The main location has about
50 users - small LAN, branch office 2 has a half a dozen or so, also on a
small LAN.

The principal requirement fiunctional is that users at the main office can
send a print job to any of the printers located at any of the two offsite
locations from within an application running on their desktop and that users
at any of the two field offices can send a print job to any other field
office printer or any main office printer.

We are now thinking of installing an ISA server 2004 at the main office and
implement a VPN. To print as described above, do we also need to install an
ISA server at the site that has a small LAN? I know we can print now (we're
doing it without a VPN) to all sites, however I wonder if a VPN changes
anything in this regard.

I think the answer is probably no and I don't need to install a second ISA
server at branch office 2, but before I stick my neck out with a definite
recommendation I would like to be sure.

Any help and a short explnation would be greatly appreciated.

Bob


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-21-2005, 08:19 PM

"Bob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...

> We are now thinking of installing an ISA server 2004 at the main office

and
> implement a VPN. To print as described above, do we also need to install

an
> ISA server at the site that has a small LAN? I know we can print now

(we're
> doing it without a VPN) to all sites, however I wonder if a VPN changes
> anything in this regard.


Impossible to answer. You have never indicated by what means these networks
connect to each other now. There is a huge difference between doing it over
private lease lines with RFC Private IP#s or over the Public Internet with
all machine using Public IP# or by running NAT Devices at each site so they
use private IP#s and use VPN to jump the NAT Devices. You could easily
already have a very bad design that is "unworkable" and will have to be
totally restructured.

--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html

Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2004.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2000.asp

Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
-----------------------------------------------------



 
Reply With Quote
 
Neteng
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-21-2005, 09:31 PM
It sounds like your doing internet printing. If you want lan to lan
communications via a VPN you will need a VPN tunnel terminating device at
each end. It may/may not change the ways things work, most likely it will. I
don't work with MS VPN much but with a Cisco you have to setup policy
routing when you do a static NAT and VPN. I don't know if MS can handle this
or if you just want to run everything over the tunnel.

"Bob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Customer has three locations, a main office and two branch offices. Branch
> office 1 has only one computer and one printer . The main location has

about
> 50 users - small LAN, branch office 2 has a half a dozen or so, also on a
> small LAN.
>
> The principal requirement fiunctional is that users at the main office can
> send a print job to any of the printers located at any of the two offsite
> locations from within an application running on their desktop and that

users
> at any of the two field offices can send a print job to any other field
> office printer or any main office printer.
>
> We are now thinking of installing an ISA server 2004 at the main office

and
> implement a VPN. To print as described above, do we also need to install

an
> ISA server at the site that has a small LAN? I know we can print now

(we're
> doing it without a VPN) to all sites, however I wonder if a VPN changes
> anything in this regard.
>
> I think the answer is probably no and I don't need to install a second ISA
> server at branch office 2, but before I stick my neck out with a definite
> recommendation I would like to be sure.
>
> Any help and a short explnation would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Bob
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Bob
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-21-2005, 10:01 PM
Phillip, Thanks for your answer. I should have realized I needed to be more
specific on current setup

Main Office is running behind a watchguard Connected to the internet. It has
a public IP and all internal machines have private IPS (192.168.1.X).
There's a domain with a DC and a BDC on W2k servers, also running AD. We're
connecting to branch 2 via public Internet going out thru the firewall using
a cable modem connection and home office has fixed public IP, branch 2 is on
an ADSL line, with a fixed Public Ip and machine and printer are on private
IP Natted (range 192.168.1.X)

We're connecting to branch 1 from home office only for now, from one of our
switches(hubs) at Home office to a Gandalf router connected to dedicated
ISDN lines, always open ( its not long distance) home network side of home
Gandalf has a private IP, Public fixed IP and same at branch 1 (Gandalf) to
hub to computers with private Ip address range (192.168.1.X). As I think of
them (and I may be wrong) I consider the route accross the Gandalfs in the
same way as I would a simple cable between a two switches except that its
slower. In practical terms I notice that I can't have duplicatre private IP
adresses at home office and at branch 1, and I don't think that that's good.

I think they should get away from using ISDN and switch over to ADSL (cable
is not available at branch 1, nor is any other high speed connection at
least at a reasonable price for a small co.) I would think of setting up the
branch 1 office behind a watchguard router with a fixed public IP and
private internal IP's for the computers and printers there. A couple of
years back they had ADSL installed but the owner did not want to give up the
ISDN's untill it was proven to him that the ADSL would work reliably.
Unfortunately, at that time it was not satisfactory (not my fault, we didn't
do that install, the service provider did and screwed it up). So not sure if
we can get him to move away from ISDN, I doubt it.

One of the problems is that they have a Unix box that prints to branch 1
from a Unix prog we don't control, but we know it goes over the ISDN wires.
I don't know how that Unix printing would be affected by moving to ADSL and
a VPN. That's just one of the things I'm trying to get a handle on without
any collaboration from the guys who installed the program. Oh well.

In any case Phillip, thanks for taking the time to answer. If you have any
other insights I would realy appreciate them.

Bob

"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Bob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>> We are now thinking of installing an ISA server 2004 at the main office

> and
>> implement a VPN. To print as described above, do we also need to install

> an
>> ISA server at the site that has a small LAN? I know we can print now

> (we're
>> doing it without a VPN) to all sites, however I wonder if a VPN changes
>> anything in this regard.

>
> Impossible to answer. You have never indicated by what means these
> networks
> connect to each other now. There is a huge difference between doing it
> over
> private lease lines with RFC Private IP#s or over the Public Internet with
> all machine using Public IP# or by running NAT Devices at each site so
> they
> use private IP#s and use VPN to jump the NAT Devices. You could easily
> already have a very bad design that is "unworkable" and will have to be
> totally restructured.
>
> --
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
> http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html
>
> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2004.asp
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2000.asp
>
> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-24-2005, 06:45 PM
"Bob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> and same at branch 1 (Gandalf) to
> hub to computers with private Ip address range (192.168.1.X). As I think

of
> them (and I may be wrong) I consider the route accross the Gandalfs in the
> same way as I would a simple cable between a two switches except that its
> slower.


That would be accuarte.

> In practical terms I notice that I can't have duplicatre private IP
> adresses at home office and at branch 1, and I don't think that that's

good.

That is correct, you cannot. Also if both sides use the same subnet block
of addresses then the private link is a "bridged connection",...if they are
using different subnet blocks then it is a "routed connection".

> I think they should get away from using ISDN and switch over to ADSL

(cable
> is not available at branch 1, nor is any other high speed connection at
> least at a reasonable price for a small co.) I would think of setting up

the
> branch 1 office behind a watchguard router with a fixed public IP and
> private internal IP's for the computers and printers there. A couple of


You could do that, but you need to consider that ADSL (unlike Synchonous
DSL) runs slower on the "upload" side,...and with VPN,...everything is an
"upload" as far as the hardware is concerned. So the VPN will "sync" at the
slower upload speed of the DSL. Even a 2 mbps ADSL may only run at 256k
upload speed,...and VPN itself has more "protocol overhead" and is less
efficient than the "straight" TCP/IP communication you already have,...so in
the end you could find yourself running even slower than you are already
going.

> One of the problems is that they have a Unix box that prints to branch 1
> from a Unix prog we don't control, but we know it goes over the ISDN

wires.
> I don't know how that Unix printing would be affected by moving to ADSL

and
> a VPN.


As long as the Printer's IP# does not change and the new topology of the LAN
accounts for the new "routing" path,..the Unix box won't know the
difference.

--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html

Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2004.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2000.asp

Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
-----------------------------------------------------





 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dumb question? kg0wx Wireless Internet 8 03-21-2006 10:04 PM
Possible dumb question Steve O Wireless Internet 2 11-23-2005 10:56 PM
A dumb question Jack Fisher Windows Networking 4 11-26-2004 03:06 AM
dumb question Alex Bird Wireless Internet 2 04-08-2004 09:40 AM
Dumb Question Harvey Gratt Wireless Internet 4 11-08-2003 04:57 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11