"Colin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:8162310F-533A-48B4-851B-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Cris,
>
> I've got to ask - why disable the router's firewall ? This puts all
> firewall
> duty onto ISA. Surely keeping the router's (limited) firewall on and
> forwarding the required ports is a better way to go ? I can't see the
> point
> of disabling an extra level of security just for the sake of it.
If I left the "router" there, I would probably leave it fully
functional,..but the problem is that it is creating a Back-to-Back DMZ
between it and the SBS/ISA. That is fine if you know how to deal with
that,...but most of the time such things get in the way of the admins more
often than they usefully stop anything "bad" from happening.
In most cases I would throw out the "router"and the ISA would *be* the
"router" for me. Unless the Connections uses PPPoE then the SOHO "router"
would probably deal with that better and so I would keep it,...although my
first choice there would be to ditch the ISP and get a Connection that
didn't use PPPoE and had a true Static Public IP#(s),...and I don't mean the
"sticky IP" crap which is just a DHCP Reservation.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html
Troubleshooting Client Authentication on Access Rules in ISA Server 2004
http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...7/ts_rules.doc
Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
Microsoft ISA Server Partners: Partner Hardware Solutions
http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/e...epartners.mspx
-----------------------------------------------------