Actually nevermind Jerry. I found the answer in one of your support articles
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;823731.
My fault for not looking.
--Vasu.
"Jerry Peterson[MSFT]" wrote:
> Active Directory users would be the simplest way to implement this. Setup a
> seperate domain for your private network. Write a quick script to create
> all 40 users in active directory and join each laptop to the domain. You
> already have a RADIUS server in place, so more than likely the domain
> controller is already in place. If that is the case, this would take just a
> few minutes to setup.
>
> This would satisfy your per user tracking requirements. You wouldn't have
> to create a new user on each laptop. Authentication permissions could be
> centralized at the domain level. Further, you could use domain policy to
> enable per user configurations and applications. This would also be far
> more secure than the current model.
>
> --
> Jerry Peterson
> Windows Network Services - Wireless
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> "Mike McAlister" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:464E2BA5-2060-4B0D-B89D-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > We are deploying 10 laptops into 10 cars for about 40 users that are in a
> > different car everyday. There is no network to authenitcate to, other
> > than
> > the wireless routers for internet access. I just don't want to create
> > that
> > many user accounts on each laptop if I don't have to.
> >
> > The laptops are basically used to create Word and Excel documents on. We
> > are in a university setting and our private network is completely
> > standalone
> > from the universitys. Thus connection through the wireless router to our
> > network is not possible. My users are just wanting to access the network
> > resources so that they may use a web browser to e-mail the documents to
> > their
> > supervisors rather than using the issued thumb drives to take it to the
> > supervisor.
> >
> > My superiors want each person to have to authenticate to the router so
> > that
> > their web usage can be more easily tracked through the university IT
> > department if needed.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > "Jerry Peterson[MSFT]" wrote:
> >
> >> The credentials are cached because each time you roam you would need to
> >> MANUALLY reenter the credentials. I've seen several wireless drivers
> >> spontaneously roam when more than one access point is in range. Some of
> >> these devices will roam 4 or more times per minute without even moving
> >> the
> >> laptop an inch in any direction.
> >>
> >> Multiple users sharing a Windows logon session is patently unsecure.
> >> Your
> >> network users should have a seperate logon for each session on the local
> >> computer. When one users finishes, they log-off, and then the next user
> >> logs on. If you have deployed active directory in your enterprise, then
> >> you
> >> can even use the AD user credentials for automatic authentication
> >> skipping
> >> the prompts altogether.
> >>
> >> Is there a special reason why your clients must deviate from this model?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jerry Peterson
> >> Windows Network Services - Wireless
> >>
> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> >> rights.
> >> "Mike McAlister" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> >> message
> >> news:B9A5D968-C0D0-4D2A-80ED-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > Does anyone know how to disable a windows XP SP2 box from cacheing the
> >> > user
> >> > id and pw when you log into a wirless provider that is using PEAP? I
> >> > want
> >> > to
> >> > force each user to use their own user id and pw when they access the
> >> > wireless
> >> > network.
> >> >
> >> > I found a solution that I can do, but I don't want my users poking
> >> > around
> >> > the registry.... I found the registry key that stores the information
> >> > and
> >> > have sucessfully deleted it to force the input of the credentials the
> >> > next
> >> > time that the wireless network is accessed. However, it just
> >> > re-creates
> >> > the
> >> > registry key.... Back to square 1.
> >> >
> >> > Does anyone have a solution for this??
> >> >
> >> > Mike
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>