The second one would take over as long as the domain clients are configured
with it also as a preferred dns server in their tcp/ip properties. The other
issue would be that if the domain controller that went down held any of the
five fsmo roles you may have to transfer or seize them to the remaining
domain controller and also make sure it is a global catalog server. If the
failed dc is going to be restored in a short period of time from a System
State backup it may not be necessary to transfer/seize the fsmo role holders
and should only be done when the other domain controller will not be
restored from a System State backup. --- Steve
"Thelazyadmin.com" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Yes teh second DC would take over. In actullity they both operate
> together, but can operate independantly if one goes down. Its alot easier
> to lose a DC if you have a seond DC. If you have two DCs and one dies,
> you can remove it from AD with NTDSUTIL and then reinstall and promote it
> and it will pull all necessarry AD info from the operational DC.
>
> Two DC's is definatley the recommended way 
>
> --
>
> Rodney Buike MCSE 2000/2003
> http://thelazyadmin.com
>
>
> "Dan Page" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Thank you!
>>
>> I do backup the system state along with everything else using NTbackup
>> included with windows, I don't know if this is the best solution as I'm
>> pretty new to this. The idea of having a 2nd computer as a backup Domain
>> Controller is attractive, would it automatically take over if my first DC
>> failed? Could I also use this to build a new server when my current
>> server becomes outdated?
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>