The problem is the FSMO roles. In the case of catrastrophic failure of DC1,
you could seize the roles on DC2 and your domain should survive with
relatively little re-configuration or other dislocation. However, do NOT
seize roles as part of a test - there are major consequences for DC1. See:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;255504
and
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;216498
Doug Sherman
MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
"Marka" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> We are a single site with a Windows 2000 domain. We have 2 DC's - DC1 &
DC2.
>
> DC1 was the first one to be installed and has all the five FSMO roles
> running on it.
>
> We also made DC2 into a Global Catalog Server as Exchange 2003 (which we
> have running on a 2003 member server) wouldn't run if DC1 went down..
>
> Our MAIN concern is if DC1 fails, we would need DC2 to run on its own.
>
> We tested this situation by shutting down DC1, leaving DC2 running.
>
> When running on DC2, a number of our client machines were very slow and
not
> usable, but some of our client machines seemed to be running OK ??
>
> What would we need to do to make sure DC2 can run all clients OK if DC1
goes
> down.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark
>
>