If you are running Active Directory you should not be using ICS. ICS is
a very limited application and is not compatible with AD and the way that
DNS works with AD.
If you want the "new" subnet to interact with the AD, forget about ICS.
Set the two subnets up to use normal IP routing. If possible, don't use the
server as a router (as this may interfere with browsing on the LAN). Set all
machines to use the DNS server for the domain (I assume that this is on the
W2k DC) and use the NAT router on the 172. subnet. With your current setup
you are doing NAT twice from the 192.168 subnet.
Mike Ryan wrote:
> "Mike Ryan" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Joshua Bolton" wrote:
>>
>>> Is routing thru the server working ie. can you ping from the
>>> 192.x.x.x to the 172.x.x.x network?
>> yes they can
>>>
>>> Do the 192.x.x.x workstations get their ip from the 2003 server?
>>>
>> no static ip's
>>
>>> Does your MS DNS contain host and ptr records for the 2003 server?
>>
>> I do not know how do I check and add these? The 2003 server is a
>> member of the domain.
>>
>>> You may need to add the 192.x.x.x network to AD sites and services.
>> How do I do that?
>>
>
> I did some more checking and found out that the windows 2003 server
> shows up in the active directory on the windows 2000 server but not
> in the network neighborhood of the windows 2000 server. The windows
> 2003 server also just shows the 192.168.0 network in its network
> neighborhood none of the computers on the 172.18.40 network
|