On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:59:58 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:
>Shadow <sh@dow> hath wroth:
>
>>http://www.edimax.com/en/produce_det...id=1&pl2_id=44
>
>OK, I was wrong. It's a conventional 802.11b/g wireless PCI card.
>
>> With drivers it gets an invalid 10.10.10.1 type address from
>>the ISP. Without drivers I can't see it :P
>
>That's normal. Most WISP (wireless ISP) providers do NOT supply
>routeable IP addresses. 10.xxx.xxx.xxx is part of RFC-1918
>non-routeable private IP addresses.
><http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1918.html>
Sure, it gives me a 10.10.10.x address via DHCP, if I use an
invalid mac and wep key.
If I use a valid one, I can choose which 172.x.x.x address I
use (depends only on mac, as wep key is same for all users). Legit
users do not have dhcp, they get static IPs
>
>> Using linux.
>
>OK, what makes you think there are no drivers? If you're using the
>card and it gets an IP address, there's certainly a driver somewhere.
>Probably came with your unspecified Linux mutation.
It's a router. It has a USRobotics 56k modem and the wireless
card.
And two linux liveCDs which I built myself. The dialup CD
certainly does not have a ralink driver, and vice-versa. I exchange
them as needed.
>
>> Like someone might locate the PC by the MAC address, even if I
>>unload the drivers. Using a directional antenna, and a netstumbler on
>>a laptop. Something like that.
You see, when I'm using the dialup CD, which I do 98% of the
time, my antenna and wireless card are all there, but no drivers.
Wondering if someone could sniff it out. That was the original
question. I don't have a laptop to test ....
>
>All 802.11 wireless is bridging. Bridging requires that everyone know
>the various MAC addresses. MAC addresses are sent in the clear and
>not encrypted. I suppose once can precipitate a DoS attack if I knew
>your MAC address, but that's about it.
>
>> I deduce the answer is yes ....
>
>Ummm... what's the question? Actually, I don't see a problem. If you
>disable the interface:
> ifconfig wlan0 down
>even with the MAC address, there's nothing I can do to your system.
True. Not a problem though.
>
>However, if you're worried that the WISP might find out that you're
>hacking their system with a machine that was formerly on their
>network, you may have a problem. I don't know where the 10.10.10.1
>address is coming from, but I suspect you don't have permission to use
>that system.
The 10.10.10.x I can. But it has no valid gateway. It's the
172.x.x.x one that they object to me using..... which I do only to dl
heavy stuff it the twilight hours.
PS this is the backwoods of South America. Lawyers please
refrain from commenting ....
[]'s