"George Schneider" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:46676331-1189-4586-995A-(E-Mail Removed)...
> The situation I have is that we are currently in a Mixed WIndows 200
> Domain
> Enviroment and have to move to a Windwos 2003 Doamin enviroment. What I
> want
> to do i build a new domain form scratch that way we have a brand new clean
> network.
>
> The question we our current domain ad.company.com which
That is too many "dots". There should only be one "dot". With two "dots"
you are telling it that you have a:
Machine called "ad"
a Domain called "company"
Top-Level Domain called "com"
"ad" could be a Child Domain but nothing you have described elsewhere
implies that this is the case (unless I missed it).
> seems to pose a
> prblem with cleints that launch IE7 for the first time it apprently
> automatically tries to automatically detect the settings and tries to I
> assume connect ot the proxy of the internet registered proxy of
> company.com
> which is not our dns registered address even though we are using it as
> part
> of internal name space.
IE is not going to detect anything unless the DNS Service the machine is
using has been configured to use Proxy Auto-detection with WPAD. It would
just try in vain for a few seconds,...give up,...and move on without a
proxy.
> What I have for this new project is 10 production dc's and 1 test dc.
Unless you have 10,000 or more users there is no point in 10 DCs. Two is
enough
> want to create two domains one for production and one forthe test domain.
> Can I create two doamins in the same forest even though the internal
> domain
> name space will not be strating at the top of the forest. For example I
> want
> to use corpoarate.comapny.net and test.company.net?
Having multiple Domains of that nature is "old-school" from the days of NT4
and flat domains,...the new modern pilosophy now is "...have as few domains
as possible,...perferably only one". There are valid Master/Child Domain
scenarios, but unless you have 10,000 users and multiple physical location
separated by slow WAN links there is no point in it. If you have a "test
domain" then it should logically be as separate and distinct and as
independent as possible,...and more importantly *expendable* without
screwing up your Forest.
Create two Forests,..one Domain per Forest. Then establish a flat trust
between the two Forests. Then if you screw up the Test Domain (as most
people do eventually) you just break the Trust and all is well,...no damage
done to the schema of the "good" Forest.
> resolution. mY question is for our DNS namespace can I used our
> registered
> DNS name space which is also our email domain?
Email domains are totally irrelevant to this.
Whether your AD Domain and your Public Domain are spelled the same is
*almost* irrelevant and is pretty much a personal *preference*. There are
pros and cons to either way of doing it and they are fairly easy to overcome
in either case.
> security risk if we were resolving both internal and external resolution
> since a attacker coyuld learn of the cleints on our internal domain if we
> hosted everything? Since our ISP does all public resolution for our web
> presence would this still be a risk? Is it still advisiable in this case
> to
> segemnt the intenral DNS name space form the public domain names?
There is no security element to it although there is probably plenty of
"superstition" in the industry that there might be a security risk.
Split-brain DNS has a role to play no matter which way you do it. It is
just done slightly different depending on if the spelling is the same or
different. Split-DNS is not hard to deal with but you do have to know a
little bit about DNS and keep in mind that you did in fact use Split-DNS,
and therefore have to manage DNS with the fact in mind that you did actually
use Split-DNS.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------