how do you find windows shared folders?

I am writing a piece of software to back up a shared folder on one
computer to another computer.
I need a list of the shared folders available on the network I am
connected to by ethernet.
The computers are both windows machines... One is a Windows 98 computer
and the other (the one that is doing the query) is windows XP.

I am writing in VB6 and Visual C++ (I do OCXs in C++)

I am comfortable writing socket level code to broadcast a discovery
packet if that is necessary,
and parse the response results, but if there is already an API for this
then of course that would be better.

Thanks.
B.

Below is a function to tell you if a folder is shared. Now you need code
to enumerate network folders. Perhaps you can use this:
http://vbnet.mvps.org/code/browse/browsenetwork.htm

Const SHGFI_ATTRIBUTES = &H800
Const SFGAO_SHARE = &H20000
Private Type SHFILEINFO
hIcon As Long
iIcon As Long
dwAttributes As Long
szDisplayName As String * 260
szTypeName As String * 80
End Type
Private Declare Function SHGetFileInfo Lib "shell32.dll" Alias
"SHGetFileInfoA" _
(ByVal pszPath As String, ByVal dwFileAttributes As Long, _
psfi As SHFILEINFO, ByVal cbFileInfo As Long, ByVal uFlags As Long) As
Long
Private Function IsFolderShared(ByVal folderName As String) As Boolean
Dim sfi As SHFILEINFO
SHGetFileInfo folderName, 0, sfi, Len(sfi), SHGFI_ATTRIBUTES
IsFolderShared = (sfi.dwAttributes And SFGAO_SHARE)
End Function

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com...
> I am writing a piece of software to back up a shared folder on one
> computer to another computer.
> I need a list of the shared folders available on the network I am
> connected to by ethernet.
> The computers are both windows machines... One is a Windows 98 computer
> and the other (the one that is doing the query) is windows XP.
>
> I am writing in VB6 and Visual C++ (I do OCXs in C++)
>
> I am comfortable writing socket level code to broadcast a discovery
> packet if that is necessary,
> and parse the response results, but if there is already an API for this
> then of course that would be better.
>
> Thanks.
> B.
>