> but is Tiscali any worse than the
> others?
>
Yes they are.
You are clearly more than capable of sorting out any issues on your network
etc. without the need of Tiscali's help,
But consider the possibility of something going wrong that is out of your
control, like a fault that needs escalating to BT, or the odd fault I had
with them:-
About 18 months ago I set up Tiscali BB for someone, all went well for a
while then suddenly he was not able to access smtp.tiscali.co.uk
I happened to find an interesting 'clue' as to what might be causing this.
Typing
www.google.com into the browser redirected me to
www.google.se
And then I noticed that the IP addresses I was being issued with were
totally different to the range issued before the problem, a look-up revelled
they belonged to X-stream / Libertysurf Scandinavia
(both Tiscali acquisitions if my memory is right).
Armed with all this I called the Tiscali helpline.
I asked them if they could "fix" the IP problem, or at the very least give
me an alternative SMTP server that would work.
They were totally useless and at no time offered me an explination or even
convinced me they understood the problem, after several calls to various
agents the best they could suggest is that I use web-mail.
One insisted I re-install the modem driver "because I might have
accidentally selected Swedish as a language option" (there weren't any
language options anyway)
Another was obsessed with which motherboard and BIOS the PC was using.
They just insisted in wasting my time when it was obvious the problem wasn't
going to be at my end.
On more than one occasion when we weren't getting anywhere the agent
appeared to hang up on me.
Before the service was finally, cancelled I had to install a local SMTP
server to send mail out, I know that is not generally advisable but Tiscali
gave me no choice. I protected it with a strong password.
--
Graham.
%Profound_observation%