(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>Hi, I kinda new to wireless networking but wanted to find out if it was
>possible to make an antenna that increases the range of signals my
>notebook can receive. I have looked around and most antennas that I
>have seen are for increasing the range of a network (the sending of the
>signals?) not necessarily for reception... or if it works for
>transmission would it also work for reception?
Yes, it is reciprocal, and any improvement in transmission will be
identical to the improvement for reception.
(Note that increasing the transmit power of an Access Point might
be possible too, but has exactly the effect you are concerned with,
because it has value in one direction only.)
>Is it possible to build
>(or buy on the cheap) some sort of omni-directional antenna that will
>allow me to receive signals that are far away? Any help would be
>greatly appreciated!
Definitely! Just be warned that high gain omni-directional
antennas are not simple, and not inexpensive.
Let me provide a few technical details that you need in order to
understand what you'll be looking at.
First, antennas are measured in numbers called "dBi", which is a
logarithmic ratio. The 'd' for deci, or 1/10th. the 'B' is for
Bell, the name of the guy who came up with it. You'll see all
kinds of dB ratios used in radio work. As just dB, it's a
ratio. With a letter after it, it's a ratio compared to
something specific. The 'i' stands for a point source antenna
in outer space, called an "isotropic radiator". It's a truly
omni-directional antenna, and no such thing exists in reality.
This (imaginary) isotropic radiator as 0 dBi gain.
What you'll see called "omni" antennas are omni-directional
around the points of a compass (azimuth), but not vertically.
That's good, because you don't want to waste your radio's power
by transmitting it directly up, or directly down. Instead, that
power is redirected perpendicular to the antenna, which gives it
gain in those directions.
Because of that, a plain old every day omni antenna has a gain
of about 2 dBi. And everything else you see, you will want to
compare to that. The comparison is that a 6 dB increase in
signal strength (3 dB is twice as much power, because dB's are
logarithmic, so 6 dB is 4 times as much power) will just about
double the range of a radio link. Hence if you can walk down
the road 300 feet before you lose your connection, if you switch
from a 2 dBi antenna to an 8 dBi antenna you would probably be
able to go about 600 feet before losing the connection.
You can buy 7 dBi (almost a 6 dB increase) antennas for something
like $40 or so. More gain than that in an omni requires some
significant hardware, and will cost relatively more.
"Directional antennas", where that means directional in azimuth
instead of only in elevation, are much easier to get a lot of
gain from, and hence are less expensive (but don't do you much
good either).
There are other considerations too. The higher the antenna, the
farther it's view will be. Also the fewer obstructions, the
better. It happens that 802.11b/g wireless uses 2400MHz, and
at that frequency almost *anything* absorbs radio signals. Trees,
walls, and basically anything you can't see through. So locate
your Access Point accordingly!
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
(E-Mail Removed)