Geoff Lane wrote:
>>I would imagine that what happens is the 'disable NAT' feature just
>>puts every internal PC onto a DMZ so everything would work as it does
>>now, but withuout any NATing going on.
>
>
> Which means then it is acting like a Proxy Server.
I doubt it would act as a proxy. Most routers do not have that complexity.
If you do not have NAT then the PCs behind the router need to have real
IP addresses not private ones. If you don't have real IP addresses, then
disabling NAT will break your Internet access.
>>Please not, I have no first hand knowledge of this feature..
>
>
> Thanks for input, perhaps someone else can shed some first hand
> knowledge.
Not done this with a Linky, but when I was with A&A and had a number of
public IPs, my Zyxel ran in exactly this way and became, in essence a
modem with filtering. All of the devices behind the router had real,
routable addresses.
HTH.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---