"Bjarni" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:653471AB-9B87-4352-9561-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm not sure what stepst to take in the DHCP. Today it's just normal
scopes.
> I was reading about superscopes.
No, no, no. Superscopes are for creating Multi-Nets (old technology) and
there is no Multi-Net here. The purpose for a Multi-Net has pretty much been
eliminated by the invention of VLANs.
> How can I make Microsoft DHCP redundant? (I don't want to use x.1-x.50 on
> one server and x.51-x.100 on servera and serverb)
Then you are screwed, becuase the very thing you *have* to do is what you
say you don't want to do.
You don't actually change the scopes,..you still use the full range in both
DHCP Servers,...you just simply use Exclusions to adjust what addresses each
machine can give out. Other than the Exclusions,..the Scopes are identical.
> Do you use normal scope or superscope?
*Normal* Scopes.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html
Troubleshooting Client Authentication on Access Rules in ISA Server 2004
http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...7/ts_rules.doc
Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2004.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2000.asp
Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
Deployment Guidelines for ISA Server 2004 Enterprise Edition
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...isaserver.mspx
-----------------------------------------------------