"Neteng" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> uhhh, so what's your point here? He has his hands tied and can't use
another
My point is that he is screwed unless he can segment the machines he is
invloved with into their own segment (subnet) so that other machines outside
of his "area" don't grab addresses from his scope. If he can't do that, then
he shouldn't run DHCP at all and run static. He said most of his machine
were using reservations, so there isn't much point to running DHCP in the
first place in that case. When running static, when visitor's come in they
would aquire a static address from him.
He can segment his area off from the others with a simple Linux box or NT4
Workstation box with two Nics to build a "poor man's" router. Then he can
run DHCP without anyone bothering him.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com