That's why I always configured both DHCP's identically in every way and keep
the number of Reservations to a minimum, then use the Exclusions to create
the 50/50. I prefer 50/50 rather than 80/20 since it would be my luck that
the "80" Server would go down and I'd run out of addresses before I could
get to it to adjust the Exclusions.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
"Miha Pihler" <mihap-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Mikael,
>
> You can use 50/50. That was also usually my practice.
>
> Think about how to solve reservations (this is not related to 50/50
> question). If you make MAC reservation for user's IP on one DHCP, the
other
> can still respond with some "random" IP number since reservations are not
> replicated...
>
> Mike
>
> "Mikael Oskarsson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hi
> >
> > My customer want to install DHCP and they have 3000 client on a network
> with
> > very high bandwith 100MB/s/1 GB/s on all the network.
> > They want to have 2 DHCP-server for redundancy, and both server should
> > handled any client.
> >
> > Is it still OK to use the 80/20 role, why not 50/50?
> >
> > Any tips
> >
> > Regrads Mikael
> >
> >
>
>