Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > DG834

Reply
 
 
PJB
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-21-2005, 06:05 AM
Bought one of these recently, to replace an aging EN5861. No problem setting
up the connection, but port forwarding is being a trifle troublesome ;-)
In point of fact, I cannot get this feature to function at all.
I've got other Netgear routers, so I'm not unfamiliar with their products,
but this one has got me stymied.
I've set the relevant inbound ports, for VNC, SMTP, FTP and the like, but
GRC.com insists my router is tighter than a ducks arse ! Nothing can get
through, even with the ports set to ALLOW ALWAYS. It's running the latest
official firmware (came from Ebuyer with 1.05 on it) but
no luck so far. Has anyone got any tips to share before I package it up and
return it?

P.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
John
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-21-2005, 08:23 AM

"PJB" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Bought one of these recently, to replace an aging EN5861. No problem
> setting
> up the connection, but port forwarding is being a trifle troublesome ;-)
> In point of fact, I cannot get this feature to function at all.
> I've got other Netgear routers, so I'm not unfamiliar with their products,
> but this one has got me stymied.
> I've set the relevant inbound ports, for VNC, SMTP, FTP and the like, but
> GRC.com insists my router is tighter than a ducks arse ! Nothing can get
> through, even with the ports set to ALLOW ALWAYS. It's running the latest
> official firmware (came from Ebuyer with 1.05 on it) but
> no luck so far. Has anyone got any tips to share before I package it up
> and
> return it?
>
> P.


Mines running 1.05.00 and works fine. GRC says mines is tight as a ducks
arse too, but all the ports which I open for services allow services to
work. Are you just going with GRC and nothing else?


 
Reply With Quote
 
Tony
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-21-2005, 08:53 AM

"PJB" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Bought one of these recently, to replace an aging EN5861. No problem

setting
> up the connection, but port forwarding is being a trifle troublesome ;-)
> In point of fact, I cannot get this feature to function at all.
> I've got other Netgear routers, so I'm not unfamiliar with their products,
> but this one has got me stymied.
> I've set the relevant inbound ports, for VNC, SMTP, FTP and the like, but
> GRC.com insists my router is tighter than a ducks arse ! Nothing can get
> through, even with the ports set to ALLOW ALWAYS. It's running the latest
> official firmware (came from Ebuyer with 1.05 on it) but
> no luck so far. Has anyone got any tips to share before I package it up

and
> return it?
>
> P.


Having set up these services, are you finding that people cannot connect in
to you on those ports? I ask because I have run a DG834 for a couple of
years and GRC reports that mine is tight, even though I have many ports open
and 'WORKING' Not sure why that is, and I'm sure someone will tell us, but
the DG834G works very well, and is very stable here. I wouldn't be so keen
to send it back... Tony




 
Reply With Quote
 
Simon Pleasants
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-21-2005, 02:14 PM
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:53:07 +0100, "Tony" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>Having set up these services, are you finding that people cannot connect in
>to you on those ports? I ask because I have run a DG834 for a couple of
>years and GRC reports that mine is tight, even though I have many ports open
>and 'WORKING' Not sure why that is, and I'm sure someone will tell us, but
>the DG834G works very well, and is very stable here. I wouldn't be so keen
>to send it back... Tony


Likewise, I have no issues with my DG834G correctly forwarding ports.
Occasionally the server becomes uncooperative but that's nothing to do
with the router!
 
Reply With Quote
 
PJB
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-21-2005, 05:52 PM

"John" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "PJB" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Bought one of these recently, to replace an aging EN5861. No problem
> > setting
> > up the connection, but port forwarding is being a trifle troublesome ;-)
> > In point of fact, I cannot get this feature to function at all.
> > I've got other Netgear routers, so I'm not unfamiliar with their

products,
> > but this one has got me stymied.
> > I've set the relevant inbound ports, for VNC, SMTP, FTP and the like,

but
> > GRC.com insists my router is tighter than a ducks arse ! Nothing can get
> > through, even with the ports set to ALLOW ALWAYS. It's running the

latest
> > official firmware (came from Ebuyer with 1.05 on it) but
> > no luck so far. Has anyone got any tips to share before I package it up
> > and
> > return it?
> >
> > P.

>
> Mines running 1.05.00 and works fine. GRC says mines is tight as a ducks
> arse too, but all the ports which I open for services allow services to
> work. Are you just going with GRC and nothing else?
>
>


No, GRC was just a check, I can't FTP into the beast, nor VNC into either,
it's puzzling.
I might go back to 1.05, more tests to do yet, I've only tried from the
cable dsl side of my homelan, I'll try from my work lan tomorrow..

P.


 
Reply With Quote
 
PJB
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-21-2005, 05:54 PM

"Tony" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>
> Having set up these services, are you finding that people cannot connect

in
> to you on those ports? I ask because I have run a DG834 for a couple of
> years and GRC reports that mine is tight, even though I have many ports

open
> and 'WORKING' Not sure why that is, and I'm sure someone will tell us, but
> the DG834G works very well, and is very stable here. I wouldn't be so

keen
> to send it back... Tony
>


as per my reply to John, it's me that can't connect, from the cable dsl side
of my lan, either with ftp or vnc, but I'm gonna try it from work tomorrow.
Don't wanna send it back, I'm a bit of a fan of Netgear stuff, got two other
routers from them, that have worked flawlessly.

P.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Anthony R. Gold
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-21-2005, 06:30 PM
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:52:58 +0100, "PJB" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> I might go back to 1.05, more tests to do yet, I've only tried from the
> cable dsl side of my homelan, I'll try from my work lan tomorrow..


How can you get into the DSL side? You're not trying to connect an
ethernet cable to the phone socket?

Yes, you have to try from the WAN side of the DG834 and not from the LAN
side.

Try from work or ask someone here to test. Unfortunately your news
service does not disclose your IP address or I could have tried for SMTP
and FTP sockets. If you want me to do that, tell me the address or if you
have DNS (DynDNS?) tell me the host name.

Tony
 
Reply With Quote
 
wooosh
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-21-2005, 07:57 PM

> Having set up these services, are you finding that people cannot connect
> in
> to you on those ports? I ask because I have run a DG834 for a couple of
> years and GRC reports that mine is tight, even though I have many ports
> open
> and 'WORKING' Not sure why that is, and I'm sure someone will tell us, but
> the DG834G works very well, and is very stable here. I wouldn't be so
> keen
> to send it back... Tony
>
>
>


GRC gives a false report due to Port Scan and DOS protection on the DG834.
All incoming ports close on detection of a scan or attack. It treats the
GRC scan this way.



 
Reply With Quote
 
PJB
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-21-2005, 10:27 PM

"wooosh" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:42dffe43$0$13974$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> > Having set up these services, are you finding that people cannot connect
> > in
> > to you on those ports? I ask because I have run a DG834 for a couple of
> > years and GRC reports that mine is tight, even though I have many ports
> > open
> > and 'WORKING' Not sure why that is, and I'm sure someone will tell us,

but
> > the DG834G works very well, and is very stable here. I wouldn't be so
> > keen
> > to send it back... Tony
> >
> >
> >

>
> GRC gives a false report due to Port Scan and DOS protection on the DG834.
> All incoming ports close on detection of a scan or attack. It treats the
> GRC scan this way.


That explains the stealthed ports showing on GRC, thanks for that, didn't
know. My other netgear routers show the relevant ports as Open, which I
expected..

P.


 
Reply With Quote
 
PJB
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-22-2005, 05:48 AM

"Anthony R. Gold" <not-for-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:52:58 +0100, "PJB" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > I might go back to 1.05, more tests to do yet, I've only tried from the
> > cable dsl side of my homelan, I'll try from my work lan tomorrow..

>
> How can you get into the DSL side? You're not trying to connect an
> ethernet cable to the phone socket?



hardly ;-) No, I actually have two broadband connections, one via NTL Cable,
t'other via Bulldog ADSL.

> Yes, you have to try from the WAN side of the DG834 and not from the LAN
> side.
>
> Try from work or ask someone here to test. Unfortunately your news
> service does not disclose your IP address or I could have tried for SMTP
> and FTP sockets. If you want me to do that, tell me the address or if you
> have DNS (DynDNS?) tell me the host name.


I'll give it a whirl from work later, but thanks anyway.

P.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Netgear DG834/GT Grumps Broadband 4 06-16-2008 12:36 PM
Netgear DG834 NickNike Broadband 5 06-28-2005 09:24 PM
Netgear DG834 v2 Pete. Broadband 7 06-05-2005 01:54 PM
DG834 with VPN Andrew Welham Broadband 0 04-23-2005 02:55 PM
Netgear DG834 Max Power Home Networking 1 06-17-2004 11:19 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11