detect wardriving

Hiya,

Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers. wireless G

Thank you!!

bam Bino <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers. wireless G

Impossible for many, as they only recieve.

what about those wardrivers who attempt to access my network.

how can I log these attempts?


"Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:a4Ckc.37948$Y%(E-Mail Removed)...
> bam Bino <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > Hiya,
> >
> > Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers. wireless
G
>
> Impossible for many, as they only recieve.

In article <Oq6dnZ2XN-6bhg7dRVn-(E-Mail Removed)>, (E-Mail Removed) says...
> what about those wardrivers who attempt to access my network.
>
> how can I log these attempts?
>
>
> "Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:a4Ckc.37948$Y%(E-Mail Removed)...
> > bam Bino <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > > Hiya,
> > >
> > > Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers. wireless
> G
> >
> > Impossible for many, as they only recieve.
>
>
>
Download a copy of AirSnare. This will let you montitor your network and
alert you when someone with a bogus MAC address tries to connect.

--

Ben E. Brady
http://www.clariondeveloper.com/wepgen
FREE! Effectively manage your Wi-Fi network!
http://www.clariondeveloper.com/webmailcloak.htm
FREE! Encrypt email addresses on your web site!
Keep spam bots from sending you spam!
http://www.firewallreporting.com
Personal firewall log analysis tools for
ZoneAlarm, BlackICE, WinRoute Pro and Windows XP
Take stock of your firewall settings and take action against intruders.
http://www.videoprofessorscam.com
Don't get stung by this scam!

In article <(E-Mail Removed). com>, Ben E. Brady <y2kbrady-no-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>In article <Oq6dnZ2XN-6bhg7dRVn-(E-Mail Removed)>, (E-Mail Removed) says...
>> what about those wardrivers who attempt to access my network.
>>
>> how can I log these attempts?
>>
>>
>> "Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:a4Ckc.37948$Y%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > bam Bino <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> > > Hiya,
>> > >
>> > > Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers. wireless
>> G
>> >
>> > Impossible for many, as they only recieve.
>>
>>
>>
>Download a copy of AirSnare. This will let you montitor your network and
>alert you when someone with a bogus MAC address tries to connect.
>

Normal router log wuld not show people attempting to attach?

yah i guess. the linksyss G router has a log but it is just shows the last
100 with no timestamp
"Rico" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> In article <(E-Mail Removed). com>, Ben E.
Brady <y2kbrady-no-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >In article <Oq6dnZ2XN-6bhg7dRVn-(E-Mail Removed)>, (E-Mail Removed) says...
> >> what about those wardrivers who attempt to access my network.
> >>
> >> how can I log these attempts?
> >>
> >>
> >> "Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> news:a4Ckc.37948$Y%(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > bam Bino <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> > > Hiya,
> >> > >
> >> > > Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers.
wireless
> >> G
> >> >
> >> > Impossible for many, as they only recieve.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >Download a copy of AirSnare. This will let you montitor your network and
> >alert you when someone with a bogus MAC address tries to connect.
> >
>
> Normal router log wuld not show people attempting to attach?
>
>

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, bam Bino wrote:
> Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers. wireless G

How do you expect to know when someone is LISTENING only? IDIOT.

Point taken.
Still, that "really smart" point has already emerged in this discussion.

For those, like you, who are not at the head of the class on this, I am
talking about those wardrivers who park outside my house and attempt a
network break-in.

Do these wardrivers stop being wardrivers when they have a foot on the brake
and a finger up my wireless g-hole?



"D. Stussy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) g...
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, bam Bino wrote:
> > Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers. wireless
G
>
> How do you expect to know when someone is LISTENING only? IDIOT.
>
>

On Sun, 2 May 2004, bam Bino wrote:
> Point taken.
> Still, that "really smart" point has already emerged in this discussion.

At the time I posted my response, those other responses had not emerged at my
newsserver. Perhaps you [also] need a lesson on how newsgroups really work.

> For those, like you, who are not at the head of the class on this, I am
> talking about those wardrivers who park outside my house and attempt a
> network break-in.
>
> Do these wardrivers stop being wardrivers when they have a foot on the brake
> and a finger up my wireless g-hole?

Wardriving is the SCANNING phase. Actually connecting and using WLANs so found
is not part of wardriving. So, the answer to your last question is literally,
"Yes. They STOP being wardrivers when they have actually connected. At that
point, they are intruders (unless you have somehow already indicated that you
provide 'open' access)."

"Wardriving" sources from "wardialing," calling every number in a given region,
and the term was coined from the scan done in the movie "Wargames" 22 years ago.
It was simply a scan of the relevant phone numbers to see which ones had
computer modems on them. At no point did that scan actually attempt to enter
the systems found by the search by presenting a username or password. That was
done later and under manual control of the computer phreaker (usually a phreaker
in the case the phone numbers were not local calls). Note that I specifically
avoid the term "hacker" because this wasn't hacking.

If you knew what you were talking about, I shouldn't have to explain the terms
nor their origin. BTW, back then, 300 baud modems were the norm, but some were
lucky to have 1200 baud equipment. 2400 baud didn't show up until 1986.

Now go away little troll and bother someone else with your foolishness.

> "D. Stussy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed) g...
> > On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, bam Bino wrote:
> > > Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers. wireless > G
> >
> > How do you expect to know when someone is LISTENING only? IDIOT.

yeah, but like i said, we already got past that. I guess i need to reiterate
that all over again for you one more time
Can you figure out what the real question is??

The real question is, "what is a program like airsnort for"

But thanks for staying up late wasting time on this one.



"D. Stussy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) g...
> On Sun, 2 May 2004, bam Bino wrote:
> > Point taken.
> > Still, that "really smart" point has already emerged in this discussion.
>
> At the time I posted my response, those other responses had not emerged at
my
> newsserver. Perhaps you [also] need a lesson on how newsgroups really
work.
>
> > For those, like you, who are not at the head of the class on this, I am
> > talking about those wardrivers who park outside my house and attempt a
> > network break-in.
> >
> > Do these wardrivers stop being wardrivers when they have a foot on the
brake
> > and a finger up my wireless g-hole?
>
> Wardriving is the SCANNING phase. Actually connecting and using WLANs so
found
> is not part of wardriving. So, the answer to your last question is
literally,
> "Yes. They STOP being wardrivers when they have actually connected. At
that
> point, they are intruders (unless you have somehow already indicated that
you
> provide 'open' access)."
>
> "Wardriving" sources from "wardialing," calling every number in a given
region,
> and the term was coined from the scan done in the movie "Wargames" 22
years ago.
> It was simply a scan of the relevant phone numbers to see which ones had
> computer modems on them. At no point did that scan actually attempt to
enter
> the systems found by the search by presenting a username or password.
That was
> done later and under manual control of the computer phreaker (usually a
phreaker
> in the case the phone numbers were not local calls). Note that I
specifically
> avoid the term "hacker" because this wasn't hacking.
>
> If you knew what you were talking about, I shouldn't have to explain the
terms
> nor their origin. BTW, back then, 300 baud modems were the norm, but some
were
> lucky to have 1200 baud equipment. 2400 baud didn't show up until 1986.
>
> Now go away little troll and bother someone else with your foolishness.
>
> > "D. Stussy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed) g...
> > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, bam Bino wrote:
> > > > Please point me to software that will detect these war drivers.
wireless > G
> > >
> > > How do you expect to know when someone is LISTENING only? IDIOT.