daily.co.uk Data Centre Migration

Does anyone have an update from them when their services may be back?
Expected up time was 7am, but there's nothing to say when it will be
back on their status pages
http://www.daily.co.uk/
http://www.dailystatus.co.uk/
--
Mike News

"Mike" <turnpike_user@turnpike_REMOVEuser.THIScomANDTHI S> wrote in message
news:9xlpyxA4yr$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Does anyone have an update from them when their services may be back?
> Expected up time was 7am, but there's nothing to say when it will be back
> on their status pages
> http://www.daily.co.uk/
> http://www.dailystatus.co.uk/
> --
> Mike News

Nope - look like they must have problems getting their servers backup!

In message <49febfc3$0$2478$(E-Mail Removed)>
at 11:12:34 on Mon, 4 May 2009, R. Giskard Reventlov
<no.spam@me.?.invalid> wrote
>"Mike" <turnpike_user@turnpike_REMOVEuser.THIScomANDTHI S> wrote in
>message news:9xlpyxA4yr$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Does anyone have an update from them when their services may be back?
>>Expected up time was 7am, but there's nothing to say when it will be
>>back on their status pages
>> http://www.daily.co.uk/
>> http://www.dailystatus.co.uk/
>> -- Mike News
>
>Nope - look like they must have problems getting their servers backup!
>
Thanks for the reply..

I'd have thought they may have started it a day earlier TBH, but I guess
they didn't want to get their special vehicles stuck in BH traffic
--
Mike News

"Mike" <turnpike_user@turnpike_REMOVEuser.THIScomANDTHI S> wrote in message
news:MW9V7TBabs$(E-Mail Removed)...
> In message <49febfc3$0$2478$(E-Mail Removed)>
> at 11:12:34 on Mon, 4 May 2009, R. Giskard Reventlov
> <no.spam@me.?.invalid> wrote
>>"Mike" <turnpike_user@turnpike_REMOVEuser.THIScomANDTHI S> wrote in message
>>news:9xlpyxA4yr$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Does anyone have an update from them when their services may be back?
>>> Expected up time was 7am, but there's nothing to say when it will be
>>> back on their status pages
>>> http://www.daily.co.uk/
>>> http://www.dailystatus.co.uk/
>>> -- Mike News
>>
>>Nope - look like they must have problems getting their servers backup!
> >
> Thanks for the reply..
>
> I'd have thought they may have started it a day earlier TBH, but I guess
> they didn't want to get their special vehicles stuck in BH traffic
> --
> Mike News

They say on the status page ".. our daily.co.uk website will be unavailable
for a maximum for 9 hours, however we aim to restore individual services
throughout this window"

The fact that NOTHING is backup and running 4 hours after the expected time
is worrying!

"Mike" <turnpike_user@turnpike_REMOVEuser.THIScomANDTHI S> wrote in message
news:MW9V7TBabs$(E-Mail Removed)...
> In message <49febfc3$0$2478$(E-Mail Removed)>
> at 11:12:34 on Mon, 4 May 2009, R. Giskard Reventlov
> <no.spam@me.?.invalid> wrote
>>"Mike" <turnpike_user@turnpike_REMOVEuser.THIScomANDTHI S> wrote in message
>>news:9xlpyxA4yr$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Does anyone have an update from them when their services may be back?
>>> Expected up time was 7am, but there's nothing to say when it will be
>>> back on their status pages
>>> http://www.daily.co.uk/
>>> http://www.dailystatus.co.uk/
>>> -- Mike News
>>
>>Nope - look like they must have problems getting their servers backup!
> >
> Thanks for the reply..
>
> I'd have thought they may have started it a day earlier TBH, but I guess
> they didn't want to get their special vehicles stuck in BH traffic
> --
> Mike News

Latest on the status page

"Update Monday 4th May Networking issues at our datacenter

We are currently experiencing some networking issues in the datacenter which
are affecting all services.

This includes Websites, eShop, Emails and Daily Drive.

Although we do not have an exact time for completion our staff are working
to resolved this issue as soon as possible.

As the status page is hosted externally we shall be issuing hourly updates"

In message <49fec966$0$2549$(E-Mail Removed)>
at 11:53:25 on Mon, 4 May 2009, R. Giskard Reventlov
<no.spam@me.?.invalid> wrote
>They say on the status page ".. our daily.co.uk website will be
>unavailable for a maximum for 9 hours, however we aim to restore
>individual services throughout this window"
>
>The fact that NOTHING is backup and running 4 hours after the expected
>time is worrying!
>
I can put up with this if they at least acknowledge it to their
customers. Just seen your other post. Good news they've given us an
update and will provide hourly updates
--
Mike News