I think I solved the problem. I had the default settings for managing
the wireless adapter to use XP so I couldn't use the D-Link software.
Once I turned that off I could use the D-link software to configure
the adapter. I set the adapter to only connect to 5Gz 802.11a networks
(only in range) while before I was searching and connecting to a
number of 802.11b networks in range (presumably neighbours) which I
guess caused the dropped connections for the mapped drive
I am now maintaining about 90% signal strength and can transfer files
across the wireless network with no drops (and much faster)O
Larry
(E-Mail Removed) (Larry) wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed). com>...
> I have been running a small wireless network at home using a Xircom
> 802.11b WAP and various wireless cards including those built into a
> notebook plus the Orinoco USB wireless NIC. It works fine across two
> floors of my house, outside etc. Recently I decided for one machine I
> needed higher speed access, mainly to be able to transfer files in the
> gig range without having to wait forever :-( So I purchased a D-Link
> DWL-5000AP 802.11a WAP and a DWL AG-520 802.11a/b PCI wireless
> adapter. It all installed okay but performance is not great - mainly
> in variability in reception strength. The PC (running XP Pro) with the
> PCI wireless adapter is about 20' from the WAP which is mounted about
> 10' off the floor. There are two walls between the two devices but
> they are just wooden frame sheetrock walls.
>
> What I am finding is most of the time the reception shows excellent or
> good strength. Surfing the internet from the remote machine is fine
> but I try to map a drive on a PC on my network which is connected via
> a wired connection and then try to transfer those large files I
> mentioned, most times after a few minutes, the connection will be lost
> and the transfer will abort. I never had these problems with the
> 802.11b connection but of course for gig files, the speed is too slow.
>
> Can 802.11a and 802.11b network co-exist? I know 802.11a range isn't
> as good but I didn't think with stationary devices on both sides that
> signal strength would fluctuate that much
>
> Any ideas appreciated
>
> Thanks
>
> Larry