| Home | Register | Members | Search | Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| |
|
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The whole concept of what you are trying to do is flawed and just isn't
going to work. 1. Forget the two Nics in the Servers. 2. Replace the existing 100mbps Nics with 1000mbps Nics. (*one* Nic and *one* IP# per server). 3. Replace the Switch they connect to with either a Gigabit Switch or a 100mbps switch with add-on modules to gain at least two Gigabit ports. 4. Replace the patch cables with higher quality cables designed for the Gigabit speed if you need to. 5. Run the Servers off of those two ports. 6. The switch itself will isolate the traffic from the rest of the LAN,...that is what switches do. -- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com ----------------------------------------------------- Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2004.asp http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2000.asp Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp ----------------------------------------------------- "Steve Young" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:A3AEC2CA-CC9A-487C-8A7D-(E-Mail Removed)... > Hi, > > I'm trying to improve data transfer between two of my w2k3 servers. > Circumventing my 100Mbps switches I've installed second 1gigbyte NICs in both > machines and a crosswire patch cable linking the two. The hardware > installation went smoothly and both show 1gig connections established. Next > step was to set up routing so that only traffic originating on each machine > would move between the two interfaces. Unfortunately all traffic is still > going through the old 100Mbps route. I've copied the routing table below. > Two IPs I'm trying to linke are 192.168.0. 220 and 192.168.0.151. The other > server has the same route added (except reversed and interface 0x10004). > Anything that will help alliviate my confusion gratefully received. > > Thanks, > > Steve > > IPv4 Route Table > ================================================== ========================= > Interface List > 0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface > 0x10003 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 68 ...... Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection > 0x20004 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 67 ...... Intel(R) PRO/1000 CT Network Connection > ================================================== ========================= > ================================================== ========================= > Active Routes: > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.151 10 > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.150 1 > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 10 > 192.168.0.150 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 192.168.0.151 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 > 192.168.0.220 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 1 > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 10 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 10 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 1 > Default Gateway: 192.168.0.5 > ================================================== ========================= > Persistent Routes: > None > > Y:\>route add 192.168.0.220 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.220 METRIC 1 IF > 0x20004 > > :\>route print > > IPv4 Route Table > ================================================== ========================= > Interface List > 0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface > 0x10003 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 68 ...... Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection > 0x20004 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 67 ...... Intel(R) PRO/1000 CT Network Connection > ================================================== ========================= > ================================================== ========================= > Active Routes: > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.151 10 > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.150 1 > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 10 > 192.168.0.150 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 192.168.0.151 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 > 192.168.0.220 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 1 > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 10 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 10 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 1 > Default Gateway: 192.168.0.5 > ================================================== ========================= > Persistent Routes: > None > > Y:\>route add 192.168.0.220 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.220 METRIC 1 IF > 0x20004 > > Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] > (C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp. > > C:\Documents and Settings\administrator.SCBC>route print > > IPv4 Route Table > ================================================== ========================= > Interface List > 0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface > 0x10003 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 68 ...... Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection > 0x20004 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 67 ...... Intel(R) PRO/1000 CT Network Connection > ================================================== ========================= > ================================================== ========================= > Active Routes: > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.151 10 > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.150 1 > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 10 > 192.168.0.150 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 192.168.0.151 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 > 192.168.0.220 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 1 > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 10 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 10 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 1 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 1 > Default Gateway: 192.168.0.5 > ================================================== ========================= > Persistent Routes: > None > > C:\>ipconfig /all > > Windows IP Configuration > > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: > > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-F1-6E-10-68 > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.150 > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.5 > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.100 > 192.168.0.150 > > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2: > > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 CT Network Connection > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-F1-6E-10-67 > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.151 > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.5 > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.100 > 192.168.0.150 > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve Young
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Phillip,
Thanks for the response. Is there really no way to make this work? I'm employed by a small a charity so $ is an issue. Hence the experiment with NiCs and crosswire patch cable. No-one is about to give me money for a new switch sadly. Steve "Phillip Windell" wrote: > The whole concept of what you are trying to do is flawed and just isn't > going to work. > > 1. Forget the two Nics in the Servers. > 2. Replace the existing 100mbps Nics with 1000mbps Nics. (*one* Nic and > *one* IP# per server). > 3. Replace the Switch they connect to with either a Gigabit Switch or a > 100mbps switch with add-on modules to gain at least two Gigabit ports. > 4. Replace the patch cables with higher quality cables designed for the > Gigabit speed if you need to. > 5. Run the Servers off of those two ports. > 6. The switch itself will isolate the traffic from the rest of the > LAN,...that is what switches do. > > -- > Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] > www.wandtv.com > ----------------------------------------------------- > Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing > http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html > > Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance > http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2004.asp > http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2000.asp > > Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners > http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp > ----------------------------------------------------- > > > "Steve Young" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:A3AEC2CA-CC9A-487C-8A7D-(E-Mail Removed)... > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to improve data transfer between two of my w2k3 servers. > > Circumventing my 100Mbps switches I've installed second 1gigbyte NICs in > both > > machines and a crosswire patch cable linking the two. The hardware > > installation went smoothly and both show 1gig connections established. > Next > > step was to set up routing so that only traffic originating on each > machine > > would move between the two interfaces. Unfortunately all traffic is still > > going through the old 100Mbps route. I've copied the routing table below. > > Two IPs I'm trying to linke are 192.168.0. 220 and 192.168.0.151. The > other > > server has the same route added (except reversed and interface 0x10004). > > Anything that will help alliviate my confusion gratefully received. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve > > > > IPv4 Route Table > > > ================================================== ========================= > > Interface List > > 0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface > > 0x10003 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 68 ...... Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection > > 0x20004 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 67 ...... Intel(R) PRO/1000 CT Network > Connection > > > ================================================== ========================= > > > ================================================== ========================= > > Active Routes: > > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface > Metric > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > 1 > > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 192.168.0.150 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > 1 > > 192.168.0.151 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > 10 > > 192.168.0.220 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 1 > > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 1 > > Default Gateway: 192.168.0.5 > > > ================================================== ========================= > > Persistent Routes: > > None > > > > Y:\>route add 192.168.0.220 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.220 METRIC 1 IF > > 0x20004 > > > > :\>route print > > > > IPv4 Route Table > > > ================================================== ========================= > > Interface List > > 0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface > > 0x10003 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 68 ...... Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection > > 0x20004 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 67 ...... Intel(R) PRO/1000 CT Network > Connection > > > ================================================== ========================= > > > ================================================== ========================= > > Active Routes: > > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface > Metric > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > 1 > > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 192.168.0.150 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > 1 > > 192.168.0.151 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > 10 > > 192.168.0.220 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 1 > > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 1 > > Default Gateway: 192.168.0.5 > > > ================================================== ========================= > > Persistent Routes: > > None > > > > Y:\>route add 192.168.0.220 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.220 METRIC 1 IF > > 0x20004 > > > > Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] > > (C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp. > > > > C:\Documents and Settings\administrator.SCBC>route print > > > > IPv4 Route Table > > > ================================================== ========================= > > Interface List > > 0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface > > 0x10003 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 68 ...... Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection > > 0x20004 ...00 0c f1 6e 10 67 ...... Intel(R) PRO/1000 CT Network > Connection > > > ================================================== ========================= > > > ================================================== ========================= > > Active Routes: > > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface > Metric > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > 1 > > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 192.168.0.150 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > 1 > > 192.168.0.151 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > 10 > > 192.168.0.220 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 1 > > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 10 > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.150 > 1 > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.151 192.168.0.151 > 1 > > Default Gateway: 192.168.0.5 > > > ================================================== ========================= > > Persistent Routes: > > None > > > > C:\>ipconfig /all > > > > Windows IP Configuration > > > > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: > > > > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : > > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network > Connection > > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-F1-6E-10-68 > > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No > > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.150 > > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 > > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.5 > > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.100 > > 192.168.0.150 > > > > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2: > > > > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : > > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 CT Network > Connection > > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-F1-6E-10-67 > > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No > > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.151 > > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 > > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.5 > > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.100 > > 192.168.0.150 > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Steve Young" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:3B3A8175-1C64-4B3E-B3B9-(E-Mail Removed)... > Thanks for the response. Is there really no way to make this work? No. Nothing that doesn't create a huge complicated difficult to manage mess. > I'm > employed by a small a charity so $ is an issue. Hence the experiment with > NiCs and crosswire patch cable. No-one is about to give me money for a new > switch sadly. They don't cost that much. You can get a small 4 or 8 port gigabit switch at the nearest BesBuy, Circuit City, whatever,..probably for less than $100,..which is about the price of two tank fulls of gas now-a-days. You Cat5 patch cables are probably already fine. If this is that low-budget of an outfit, then your network propbably isn't big enough or generating enough traffic to have to worry about the whole entire thing you are considering in the first place. We are an affiate TV News Station with around 100 units on the local LAN at this one site (over 20 sites total) and my 100mbps network isn't even breathing hard. -- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com ----------------------------------------------------- Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2004.asp http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2000.asp Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp ----------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve Young
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Phillip,
Didn't know you could get 4 and 8 port gigabyte switches. That sounds like a solution. Traffic only get jammed on my network when I want to shift a 75Gig backup file during the day. Not something I choose to do often, but ntbackup stalls frequently enough to make it necessary sometimes. Cheers, Steve "Phillip Windell" wrote: > "Steve Young" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:3B3A8175-1C64-4B3E-B3B9-(E-Mail Removed)... > > Thanks for the response. Is there really no way to make this work? > > No. Nothing that doesn't create a huge complicated difficult to manage mess. > > > I'm > > employed by a small a charity so $ is an issue. Hence the experiment with > > NiCs and crosswire patch cable. No-one is about to give me money for a > new > > switch sadly. > > They don't cost that much. You can get a small 4 or 8 port gigabit switch at > the nearest BesBuy, Circuit City, whatever,..probably for less than > $100,..which is about the price of two tank fulls of gas now-a-days. You > Cat5 patch cables are probably already fine. > > If this is that low-budget of an outfit, then your network propbably isn't > big enough or generating enough traffic to have to worry about the whole > entire thing you are considering in the first place. We are an affiate TV > News Station with around 100 units on the local LAN at this one site (over > 20 sites total) and my 100mbps network isn't even breathing hard. > > -- > Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] > www.wandtv.com > ----------------------------------------------------- > Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing > http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html > > Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance > http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2004.asp > http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/t...dance/2000.asp > > Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners > http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp > ----------------------------------------------------- > > > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dedicated servers with 24/7 live chat ticket and email support fullymanaged servers with 5 Dedicated IPS.www.servers500.com | Master reseller hosting Provider | Wireless Internet | 0 | 01-15-2011 01:36 PM |
| VPN between 2 2k3 servers | Jason Williard | Windows Networking | 2 | 06-01-2005 08:59 PM |
| Replacing old servers with new servers, same name and ip address | =?Utf-8?B?Q2hhcmxpZQ==?= | Windows Networking | 5 | 12-07-2004 08:52 PM |
| No network Connectivity between 2 servers (windows 2003 servers) | ImraneA | Windows Networking | 1 | 11-26-2004 11:18 AM |
| NEED TO DOWNLOAD 98 UPDATES Networking XP + 98 via Ethernet crosswire | Tinkerbell | Windows Networking | 5 | 09-07-2004 08:34 PM |
Forum Software Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc. |



Linear Mode

