In article <XCiid.75837$bk1.10229@fed1read05>,
(E-Mail Removed)
says...
> In one office, when the cordless 2.4ghz phone is used, the wireless network
> hiccups, the connection is lost temporarily. Turn off the cordless phone,
> wireless is back. Change cordless phone channel while talking the wireless
> network works. I have changed the channels on the wireless (802.11b/g) setup
> to 11, 10, 6, 7, and 3. I guess, I have more channels to try. The security
> level of the routers does not matter, wep, none, wpa, same difference, the
> interference is there.
>
Smith,
It's not a good idea to use 2.4GHz cordless phones when you have
802.11b/g installed. I would strongly suggest using 900MHz cordless
phones instead. In the technical manuals on 802.11, it specifically
states to avoid the use of 2.4GHz cordless phones.
I assure you ALL cordless phones can be monitored independent of
frequency, as there are plenty of VHF/UHF/SHF receivers and monitoring
equipment available. Spread spectrum phones, on the othe hand,
certainly provide more security than single channel (or single-
frequency) phones. If you truly want security, corded phones are your
best answer.
Remember (and, many consumers simply don't understand this), a cordless
phone, regardless of what frequency it operates on, is a radio. It is a
UHF/SHF transceiver (transmitter/receiver), and thus, signals can be
received by anyone who owns a receiver capable of receiving those
frequencies. Obviously, some systems use encryption, which provide
significantly more security.
The NSA (National Security Agency) monitors certain telephone traffic
24/7.
Don