Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > Connection Denial List

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Connection Denial List

 
 
Lee
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-29-2006, 04:34 PM
Is there anyway that I can setup a connection denial list on 2003 server. For
example I would like to block out mutiple IP ranges from even communicating
with the server regardless of wheather the IP ports are approved by the
firewall?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-29-2006, 05:03 PM
Yes,...No,...Maybe.

What Firewall?
What 2003 server?
Communicate with "what" on the server?
What is the LAN topology?

You need to explain the "what & why" or there is no real way to answer that.
Also don't assume that what you want to do is even the right approach to
begin with. Layer 3&4 usually is *not* the right approach when within the
LAN, NTFS permissions and Application Level Security usually *are*,...but
there is no way to know that without more details.

--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com




"Lee" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:42105206-AD20-4787-B18B-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Is there anyway that I can setup a connection denial list on 2003 server.

For
> example I would like to block out mutiple IP ranges from even

communicating
> with the server regardless of wheather the IP ports are approved by the
> firewall?



 
Reply With Quote
 
Lee
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-29-2006, 07:08 PM
I think it really boils down to holes in the O/S. For example I get a great
amount of continuous (note, continuous) chatter from certain IP addresses.
These ip addresses are having a continuous converation with my computer;
about what I cannot determine, but I know it can't be good. It's not email,
and they are certainly not pulling up my website over and over. the stats
don't support it. So there must be something else going on that is not caught
by virus protection or spyware to allow that amount of continuous chatter. So
by blocking specific ranges of IP addresses (i.e. the known culprits) I can
cut down on potential future problems.

I am able to find these IP addresses using Network Monitor, now I just need
to block them. My previous service provider used a more robust router and I
was able to put the blocks in there much like I can do in Exchange to
eliminate any conversation at all.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-29-2006, 11:17 PM
"Lee" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:1EB798E5-B0B0-40C2-A7AF-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I think it really boils down to holes in the O/S.


No,....not really.

> For example I get a great
> amount of continuous (note, continuous) chatter from certain IP addresses.
> These ip addresses are having a continuous converation with my computer;
> about what I cannot determine,


It is supposed to be that way.

> but I know it can't be good.


Actually, it probably is good.

> It's not email,
> and they are certainly not pulling up my website over and over. the stats
> don't support it. So there must be something else going on that is not

caught
> by virus protection or spyware to allow that amount of continuous chatter.

So
> by blocking specific ranges of IP addresses (i.e. the known culprits) I

can
> cut down on potential future problems.


....and you will most likely destroy the Ethernet LAN functionality.

>> I am able to find these IP addresses using Network Monitor, now I just

need
> to block them. My previous service provider used a more robust router and

I
> was able to put the blocks in there much like I can do in Exchange to
> eliminate any conversation at all.


Service Provider? We were talking about LANs,...how did it switch to ISPs
and the Internet?


--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com


 
Reply With Quote
 
Lee
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-30-2006, 01:42 PM
We were talking about denying connections to certain IP addresses. It should
not matter where they exist, LAN or WAN, But in this case WAN.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-30-2006, 05:36 PM
"Lee" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:A5B0C0DC-B9A2-404D-BCBC-(E-Mail Removed)...
> We were talking about denying connections to certain IP addresses. It

should
> not matter where they exist, LAN or WAN, But in this case WAN.


You're are taking the wrong approach it sounds like to me. What kind of
"WAN"? Just calling a "WAN" is too generic,..I need to know what it is
really designed like. Is traffic between the LAN Sites all live in one
subnet?,...different subnets "routed"?,...different subnets "Nat'ed"? Is
each individual LAN all one subnet within thier own self?

--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Denial of Service attack in sendmail John Linux Networking 2 09-06-2007 06:38 AM
My ISP wish list Simon Ough Broadband 17 11-16-2005 09:19 AM
"denial of service" attacks Mr.Jason Linux Networking 12 06-06-2005 01:49 AM
Dialup List? Si. Broadband 1 07-10-2004 10:32 AM
MN-740 wish list Sean Broadband Hardware 1 01-18-2004 06:53 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11