Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Network Hardware > Network Routers > How to Configure Site-to-Site VPN in Cisco Routers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

How to Configure Site-to-Site VPN in Cisco Routers

 
 
Mohammed Alani
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-02-2007, 09:09 AM
Hi all,
I have done a simplified step-by-step procedure to do site-to-site
VPN. Please take a look at it and give me your notes. Is it clear and
simple? did I miss something?

How to Configure Site-to-Site VPN in Cisco Routers
http://www.routergeek.net/content/view/50/37/

All feedback is welcomed.

Regards,



Mohammed

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
David H. Lipman
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-02-2007, 08:42 PM
From: "Mohammed Alani" <(E-Mail Removed)>

| Hi all,
| I have done a simplified step-by-step procedure to do site-to-site
| VPN. Please take a look at it and give me your notes. Is it clear and
| simple? did I miss something?

OK. Now it is time to STOP spamming the web site.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mohammed Alani
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-02-2007, 09:09 PM
On May 2, 11:42 pm, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net>
wrote:
> From: "Mohammed Alani" <mohammed.al...@gmail.com>
>
> | Hi all,
> | I have done a simplified step-by-step procedure to do site-to-site
> | VPN. Please take a look at it and give me your notes. Is it clear and
> | simple? did I miss something?
>
> OK. Now it is time to STOP spamming the web site.
>
> Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
>
> --
> Davehttp://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.htmlhttp://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm


What spamming are you talking about?
Asking you for your opinion is considered spamming?
If so, you can just keep it to your self. I have received some useful
feedbacks from this group and I changed the articles according to it.
If you think that I am promoting my site through this group, you are
WRONG. My site ranks in the first five in Google's results for many
router configuration topics.
It seems like my fault that I would like to listen to your opnion,
because I thought it would be professional.
Anyway, thank you for taking the time to write your reply.


Mohammed

 
Reply With Quote
 
David H. Lipman
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-02-2007, 10:04 PM
From: "Mohammed Alani" <(E-Mail Removed)>


|
| What spamming are you talking about?
| Asking you for your opinion is considered spamming?
| If so, you can just keep it to your self. I have received some useful
| feedbacks from this group and I changed the articles according to it.
| If you think that I am promoting my site through this group, you are
| WRONG. My site ranks in the first five in Google's results for many
| router configuration topics.
| It seems like my fault that I would like to listen to your opnion,
| because I thought it would be professional.
| Anyway, thank you for taking the time to write your reply.
|
| Mohammed

Your Google "ranking" has been artificially increased becuase you are cvonstantly posting
the web site.

Post ONCE and Request For Comment. Posting numerous time for different concepts is
spamming. If you want assistance in improving the web site. No problem. Find some peers
and improve the server. However continuously posting RouterGee.Net over and over is abusing
this group.

In summation, there is NO reason to RFC posts over and over. Do it once, get you
collaborators and update the web site.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mohammed Alani
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-03-2007, 06:09 AM
On May 3, 1:04 am, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net>
wrote:

>
> Your Google "ranking" has been artificially increased becuase you are cvonstantly posting
> the web site.
>
> Post ONCE and Request For Comment. Posting numerous time for different concepts is
> spamming. If you want assistance in improving the web site. No problem. Find some peers
> and improve the server. However continuously posting RouterGee.Net over and over is abusing
> this group.
>
> In summation, there is NO reason to RFC posts over and over. Do it once, get you
> collaborators and update the web site.
>
> --
> Davehttp://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.htmlhttp://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

Do you really think that repeating the website's name in this
particular group would increase the Google ranking of it?
Mybe this is why you have a couple of websites in you signature.

 
Reply With Quote
 
David H. Lipman
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-03-2007, 09:34 PM
From: "Mohammed Alani" <(E-Mail Removed)>


| Do you really think that repeating the website's name in this
| particular group would increase the Google ranking of it?
| Mybe this is why you have a couple of websites in you signature.

That's my signature and they are NOT the subject matter of ther body of any posts.
Using a signature that is four lines or less that is demlimited by "-- " that has URLs in
the signature fully conforms to ALL standards of Netiquette and Usenet standards.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Site-to-site VPN Cisco 1811 - wireless Claudio Schnell da Silva Network Routers 0 12-03-2009 06:12 PM
Re: Site-to-site VPN Cisco 1811 - wireless Rob Network Routers 0 12-03-2009 08:41 AM
Re: Site-to-site VPN Cisco 1811 - wireless bobmct Network Routers 1 12-03-2009 05:37 AM
site to site VPN with Cisco Routers El CiD Windows Networking 3 10-09-2007 03:56 PM
another vpn wins site to site to site problem* Christopher S. Daane Windows Networking 5 04-21-2004 07:25 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11